Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[ Daily Tolkien / Lord Of The Rings ] A Tolkien Virgin: Pre-amble and The Silmarillion: Ainulindalë
Tolkien Online ^ | July 01, 13, 19, 1999 | Mark-Edmond

Posted on 12/30/2002 7:35:00 AM PST by JameRetief

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last
Join us again on Friday. For those who choose to read along, the next Tolkien Virgin article will continue with the next part of the book The Silmarillion: Valaquenta.

Happy reading!

1 posted on 12/30/2002 7:35:00 AM PST by JameRetief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: maquiladora; ecurbh; HairOfTheDog; 2Jedismom; Maigret; NewCenturions; 24Karet; Wneighbor; ...
Your Tolkien Virgin Ping!

Read along with a Tolkien Virgin as he discovers and comments on the history of Middle Earth as he reads it for the first time.  These articles start with The Silmarillion, they journey through The Hobbit and finish with Lord Of The Rings: The Return Of The King.  At the pace of 2 articles per week (Mondays and Fridays) the articles will wrap up about the same time that the final movie of the Lord Of The Rings story is released. 

If anyone would like for me to ping them directly when I post the Tolkien Virgin articles or my Daily Tolkien articles let me know. I hope that you enjoy them!

2 posted on 12/30/2002 7:35:40 AM PST by JameRetief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
The Tolkien Virgin articles:

1) Pre-amble and The Ainulindalë

You can find the latest Daily Tolkien article (along with links to the previous articles) here:

The men who would be Steward by Michael Martinez

3 posted on 12/30/2002 7:37:06 AM PST by JameRetief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2Jedismom; Alkhin; Anitius Severinus Boethius; AUsome Joy; austinTparty; Bear_in_RoseBear; ...

Ring Ping!!

4 posted on 12/30/2002 8:05:46 AM PST by ecurbh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ecurbh
Ah yes...after finally seeing The Two Towers on FRiday, I feel like I can actually contribute to these wonderful threads!!

Thanks fer the ping...MUD

5 posted on 12/30/2002 8:08:33 AM PST by Mudboy Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JameRetief
Whether The Silmarillion is good or bad history, one must keep in mind that it is not Tolkien's Silmarillion.

Tolkien never came close to finishing it. What he had at his death was a vast body of writings on various pieces of Middle Earth history, philology, mythology and geography. Being written at different points in time from 1917 up to 1973, much of it was contradictory at various points.

It was published posthumously by his son, Christopher, who had the unenviable task of trying to weave a coherent narrative out of the most publishable and less inconsistent texts. That's not to knock what Christopher Tolkien did. I doubt anyone else could have done half as well in compiling the uncompilable.

The result was not what Tolkien had in mind for the work in published form. For one thing, his envisioned work would have been about four times as long.

As published, The Silmarillion is probably closest to a mythology.

I think that the best approach to Tolkien is to take it in the order his works were in fact published. To read The Hobbit first, especially as a child. And then to go to The Lord of the Rings. These are Tolkien's most accessible works. The history underlying each which Tolkien gives us glimpses of what makes for a richer experience.

For those who crave more there are the appendices at the end of ROTK. That gives a good deal of historical overview of the background of Middle Earth. Once you've finished that you're at the end of published works as Tolkien authorized them.

The Silmarillion, Unfinished Tales, and the twelve volumes of the history of Middle Earth edited by Christopher Tolkien represent in turn the next steps for the Tolkien acolyte. Each step represents less accessible and more incomplete, fragmentary or inconsistent work.

I'd never recommend The Silmarillion to someone seeking their first introduction to Tolkien. Neither would (were he alive) Tolkien himself.

6 posted on 12/30/2002 8:16:45 AM PST by The Iguana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JameRetief; LoneGreenEyeshade; FreeTheHostages; lodwick; ST.LOUIE1; Pippin; dansangel; jla
I'll be the first to admit that I'm a SilmarillionAddict and enjoy Tolkien's work here more than even "The Lord of the Rings", which I believe blows away "The Hobbit"!! So it'll be interesting to see how a Tolkien neophyte--BTW, how can someone claim "I’ve been a fan of fantasy since before I was a teenager..." and heve never read Tolkien?--perceives this work of genius.

"It's interesting that this evil is spontaneous—it merely "came into the heart of Melkor." We should also keep in mind that he is the "mightiest," the most greatly endowed with "power and knowledge." What do you think of how Tolkien puts a determinist spin on 'evil' when Ilúvatar proclaims, "And thou, Melkor, shalt see that no theme may be played that hath not its uttermost source in me, nor can any alter the music in my despite. For he that attempteth this shall prove but mine instrument in the devising of things more wonderful, which he himself hath not imagined." So we end up with the sense that nothing is truly evil, since even when Melkor is at his worst, he's merely the instrument of Ilúvatar. And I’m pretty sure Tolkien doesn’t even use the word evil in this section. Peculiar—no?"

Interesting, but far from unique, IMHO. "Evil" is a direct decendant of FReeWill, and a conscious choice on the part of the evil-doer. The fact that Iluvatar proclaims that "...no theme may be played that hath not its uttermost source in me, nor can any alter the music in my despite. For he that attempteth this shall prove but mine instrument in the devising of things more wonderful..." is no different than the StarWars saga wherein Anakin Skywalker is created--divinely, apparently--by the need to bring "Balance to the Force", IMHO. For if there is no EVIL to be Vanquished, what need is there for Righteous Heroes?!

That said...let's bring this dichotomy back to the present day. How and why could such an inarguably EVIL Man such as Osama bil Clinton exist and rise to the highest echelons of World Power?! IMHO, it is so Clinton can be VANQUISHED by the Righteous!! Can there be any other reason for Der SchleekMeister's existence other than to see him DRAMATICALLY felled by the Goodness that is the essence of the Great American Experiment?!

I think not...MUD

BTW...RE-IMPEACH. CONVICT. DETHRONE.
DISBAR. DE-PENSION. DE-LEGITIMIZE.
INDICT. CONVICT. IMPRISON. DISCARD KEY.

7 posted on 12/30/2002 8:31:08 AM PST by Mudboy Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ecurbh
Thanks for the Ping.....

I just finished the part in The Return of the King where the ring is destroyed on Mount Doom! I guess Gollum really did have a part to play!

8 posted on 12/30/2002 8:33:25 AM PST by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: The Iguana
I agree with you. The Silmarillion is a very hard read. I loved the LOTR series as well as the Hobbit, but I was left totally confused when I tried to decipher The Silmarillion. I may just grab it again and give it another try now that this "Tolkien Virgin" thread is going.
9 posted on 12/30/2002 8:42:11 AM PST by dixierose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mudboy Slim
MUDDY, I didn't know you read Tolkien's books.
10 posted on 12/30/2002 8:46:39 AM PST by Pippin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Pippin
Oh yeah...as often as time allows...MUD
11 posted on 12/30/2002 8:48:14 AM PST by Mudboy Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mudboy Slim
Very impressive analysis, Mud.

FReegards
12 posted on 12/30/2002 8:53:27 AM PST by poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dixierose
"I was left totally confused when I tried to decipher The Silmarillion."

The massive number of names and seemingly unrelated adventures can appear cumbersome, but the beauty of the Silmarillion, IMHO, is that you can pick up the book and read one chapter at a sitting and not feel obliged to continue on to the next chapter.

FReegards...MUD

13 posted on 12/30/2002 8:53:52 AM PST by Mudboy Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: poet
Thank you, my FRiend...Tolkien went outta his way to distance his writings from religious analogies, but it is impossible for me to read him without thinking in such terms as "Good vs. Evil" (aka Right vs. Left). Americans have become spoiled by our Right to FReeSpeech in that we do not appreciate the danger writers have historically placed themselves in when they FightAgainstThePOWERSthatBe with their words. Tolkien, C.S. Lewis, Orwell...the words these folks wrote could have resulted in the deaths of these writers were the BadGuys to have won WWII or the Cold War, so I believe it is almost our duty to see the underlying themes in these works that even the writers themselves may have denied at the time.

FReegards...MUD

14 posted on 12/30/2002 9:04:06 AM PST by Mudboy Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: JameRetief; The Iguana
Thanks for the article Jame.

I don't know if I agree with Mr. Edmonds differentiating between Cosmology and History in the case of The Silmairillion. After all, the things described in The Silmarillion really happened in Middle-Earth. I don't think it matters that everything is not told in exquisite detail or that there may be some apparent inconsistencies.

Someone reading through The Silmarillion doesn't realize it, but Iguana hit on it, but The Silmarillion was not completed by Tolkien. I am sure if he had had the chance to finish and publish it himself that many of the kinks would have been worked out.

If The Silmarillion had some application towards the way of Salvation in Middle-Earth than I probably would have classified it as a Theology.
15 posted on 12/30/2002 9:24:03 AM PST by ksen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mudboy Slim
Once again, a most excellent analysis. BTW, "The Lib'rals Fate" was also excellent. I especially liked the rhyme and metre of that song.

FReegards FRiend

Gotta leave for work. Have an excellent day
16 posted on 12/30/2002 9:25:10 AM PST by poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: JameRetief
Thanks for starting this, I really look forward to following the articles/comments - though for the moment I can't start the Silmarillion since I'm reading the trilogy and just finished Two Towers last night - what a stinker that Tolkien was for cliffhangers though! I'm dying here having to do so much today before I can start The Return of the King!

I'm also very glad I hadn't read these till now, I think I wouldn't have appreciated them as much.

17 posted on 12/30/2002 10:01:56 AM PST by Maigret
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mudboy Slim
How and why could such an inarguably EVIL Man such as Osama bil Clinton exist and rise to the highest echelons of World Power?! IMHO, it is so Clinton can be VANQUISHED by the Righteous!! Can there be any other reason for Der SchleekMeister's existence other than to see him DRAMATICALLY felled by the Goodness that is the essence of the Great American Experiment?!

I think not...MUD


Interesting. But we do not know the will of God. There can be reasons completely unknown to us.
18 posted on 12/30/2002 10:34:55 AM PST by FreeTheHostages
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: FreeTheHostages
"...we do not know the will of God."

Technically, you are correct, but my Faith leads me to believe God Is Good...MUD

19 posted on 12/30/2002 10:48:42 AM PST by Mudboy Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: FreeTheHostages
"IMHO, it is so Clinton can be VANQUISHED by the Righteous!! Can there be any other reason for Der SchleekMeister's existence other than to see him DRAMATICALLY felled by the Goodness that is the essence of the Great American Experiment?! I think not...MUD"

"Interesting. But we do not know the will of God. There can be reasons completely unknown to us."

Just outta curiosity, if God is indeed Good, wouldn't he be 100% behind bringing a LawlessTyrant like Clinton to Justice?! What other "...reasons completely unknown to us" could there be for allowing Slick Willie to go unpunished and thereby setting a precedent that American Presidents are above and beyond the Laws of this Country?

FReegards...MUD

20 posted on 12/30/2002 11:03:38 AM PST by Mudboy Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson