Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Keith
I disagree with your assessment, which appears juvenile. Lincoln destroyed State Sovereignty. He had many strenghts and weaknesses. Paramount among his weaknesses was his prostituting the Constitution to preserve his vision of the "Union." This is fact. Lincoln in effect "destroyed the village in order to save it."

Indeed we have a Union, one accelerating toward Socialism where the power of the people and of the several States is rapidly diminished. We are headed toward Dictatorship and I'm very glad it will be far along enough I won't live to see it.

I sure hope the kids keep their guns.

12 posted on 02/24/2003 10:52:43 PM PST by Freedom_Is_Not_Free
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free
Unbelievable...

seriously, is the consensus of the "Lincoln was the debbil" group on this forum that we would have been better off if the South has won?

Lunacy.
13 posted on 02/24/2003 10:55:21 PM PST by Keith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free
but if it wasn't for Lincoln wouldn't Kalifornia be part of PRC?
14 posted on 02/24/2003 11:08:45 PM PST by gilor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson