[AmishDude]

Which Californians do I overestimate, exactly?

The Californians who refuse to elect a Federal official who will vigorously oppose illegal immigration.

[Joe Hadenuf]

New Jersey

Eleodora Contreras, shown being helped to a court appearance by a police escort, was the mother of Walter Contreras Valenzuela, a 10-year-old boy who was murdered by an illegal alien from Honduras. Walter enjoyed playing along the Whippany River, just a short distance from his Morristown, New Jersey, home. He liked to fish in the river, with friends or sometimes with people he met on the bank. Tragically, one whom he met, Porfirio Jimenez, was a sexual predator. In another case of INS and police failure, the alleged killer had been arrested three times, once for threatening a man with a knife, yet the illegal alien remained in America to commit much more serious crimes.

Blame it on California, blame it on Boxer.....

[Sabertooth]

---

To: AmishDude

Have they ever addressed this issue? It seems to me that the people of California are either supportive of or indifferent to illegal immigration by their choice of representation.

The Bush/Kemp/Bennett wing of the GOP has done everything in their power since 1994 to insure that we never have a choice.

California Republicans who oppose Illegals are routinely undercut by the RNC.

It will be interesting to see if Jones goes after Boxer on the issue.

If he does, he'll win.

How badly does Karl Rove want that Senate supermajority?

How badly does President Bush want his judicial nominations approved?

Badly enough to stop appeasing the Illegal Alien lobby?

We shall see.

303 posted on 07/08/2004 7:03:07 PM PDT by Sabertooth

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 297 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

---

To: Sabertooth

The party leaders have very little control of anything these days. No smokey rooms anymore. All you have to do is run for your party's nomination. That's it. No one can stop you.

If Jones could win California by opposing illegal immigration, then an outspokenly anti-illegal candidate would have easily won the GOP nomination and would be cruising to victory over the stupidest member of the Senate.

Methinks you overestimate your fellow Californians.

310 posted on 07/08/2004 7:07:43 PM PDT by AmishDude

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 303 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

---

To: AmishDude

Methinks you overestimate your fellow Californians.

The Californians who passed Prop #187?

The Californians who got rid of bilingual ed and racial preferences?

The Californians who booted Gray Davis?

The Californians who qualified a referencum to overturn Illegal Alien CDLs?

The Californians who are burning up the lines and the e-mail boxes at the DHS because they quashed the round-ups of Illegals?

The Californians who have Asa Hutchison running so scared he had to face the John and Ken Show, after earlier trying to intimidate them?

Which Californians do I overestimate, exactly?

320 posted on 07/08/2004 7:20:15 PM PDT by Sabertooth

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

---

To: Sabertooth

Which Californians do I overestimate, exactly?

The Californians who refuse to elect a Federal official who will vigorously oppose illegal immigration.

323 posted on 07/08/2004 7:22:26 PM PDT by AmishDude

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 320 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

---

You're usually better than to beg that many questions.

Candidates in California clearly don't reflect the clear, anti-Illegal Alien record of the voters here, since 1994.

I've put forth that the problem starts with the Bush/Kemp/Bennett wing and the RNC, and it started when the three of them opposed Prop #187 in 1994.

I've shown that the CA electorate is not Illegal-friendly, since 1994.

There have been no clear anti-Illegal GOP candidates since 1994.

The GOP has stunk up the ballot with weak, loser candidates since 1994.

I know you're good at math. Do it.