"I'll take the blond."
"I'll take the brunette."
"I'll take the black and tan."
It is offensive. It's soft porn.
This makes one want to bash one's head against a wall.
I have little time for the posters themselves, they are crude. That said, this country has blasphemy laws which are flagrantly ignored (as it is politically incorrect to defend Christians); yet we are forced to pander to the opinions of the mohammedians.
In the Middle Ages England was so fervent in its profession of Christianity that it was called 'Mary's Dowry'. I think that Our Lady should get her country back.
UK Muslims offended? Tough s**t!
Thanks for the pic! I intend to post it on every hydro pole around the mosque across the street from my house.
I would probably make a ten minute detour to drive past that billboard, though, so what do I know.
They should go back to their wonderful f--ing Islamic republics where they can most assuredly not be offended by such billboards!
As the Founding Director of Operation Porn Lift, in which I e mail pornographic jpgs to American Service members serving in islamic countries, I would firstly like to say that yes, this definitely qualifies as porn. Good quality porn. Nice professional lighting, and top shelf models. Yes this is porn and fine porn it is.
The second issue is should this be displayed near a mosque? To this I say most definitely. There are places where porn is appropriate (In private, at work on the internet, etc.) and places it is not (around children, waiting for jury duty, etc.).
Porn can do many things, titillate, expand horizons, serve as a proxy partner, or offend mongrel savages from the eighth century who have no business walking around civilized people without being on the end of a leash.
In fact, it not only titillates and offends, but it serves a third purpose in reminding muslims that their women are so ugly that they have to walk around in head to toe bags so as not to disgust others.
”Guns Before Butter.”
Anyone else think those three models with their...GEORGOUS backs...to us are the same person with different wigs? I can't see any difference in the bodies.
I personally think Sloggi shoulda fought them and sued the mosqs for illigaly tearing down private property. Laying down and placating Muslims doesn't work. Granted this issue was popular and most people wanted naked images out of public site but next time it ll be something different. There needs to be a legal rebuff to make sure that illigal action is not reward as is in this case the way I see it.
I personally think Sloggi shoulda fought them and sued the mosqs for illigaly tearing down private property. Laying down and placating Muslims doesn't work. Granted this issue was popular and most people wanted naked images out of public site but next time it ll be something different. There needs to be a legal rebuff to make sure that illigal action is not reward as is in this case the way I see it.