"For the atheist, the simple yet difficult scientific phenomena to explain is the difference between the universal Scientific God, entropy, vs. the Earthly natural Scientific God, evolution. Remember entropy, the force behind the big bang and the awesome power of the universe, predicts systems should “evolve” from a state of order to disorder. Evolution, observed on the planet Earth, predicts systems are evolving from a state of disorder to order. If the scientific God is all that is and ever was, it has the same level of confusion and identity as the Democratic Party."
You say you are arguing pure science. How do you know the force behind the big bang is entropy? How do you know there was a big bang?
Evolution doesn't predict order to disorder or disorder to order. It predicts change to insure survival.
You may think you are talking science, but I think you just think you are. The crucial debate here is biological evolution, what it contains and what it doesn't contain.
Your putting "entropy" into the mix is about the same as putting original creation into the mix. It just isn't pertinent to understanding the TOE. Thus, it is rot.
I'm not an atheist, so my objective was to first state how scientific atheist think and to contrast that with the theory of evolution, without going into much detail. In doing so, I came across the PhD Organic chemist's explanation, which was a much better argument against evolution.