Replies

No, this is not a "I assert therefore I'm right" argument, it is an argument based upon the process of elimination, because the Universe could not have existed forever, and because the universe could not have been created without some reaction beforehand, a reaction must have taken place to result in the universe. The only logical possible identity of that force is a deity of some sort. Had you bothered to read post #126, you would know that the argument is based in part on the process of elimination.

Are you still harping on that horsesh!t? Do you really think you have "proven" anything?

I gave you a couple of hints - do us all a favor and look them up.

HA... This will make the second non-creationist to cuss at me on this thread. I know stereotyping is not neccesarily a good thing, but you guys are going a long way to prove the stereotype.

" Do you really think you have "proven" anything?"

So you're saying I can't prove anything.

This is great... We've gone from "I can't prove anything," to "we can assume everything," back to "I can't prove everything" all in the same thread. This is getting ridiculous. just give up the argument already. I won, and you are reduced to hurling cursewords and ad hominem attacks at me.

" I gave you a couple of hints - do us all a favor and look them up."

You gave me zero "hints" you attempted to argue my point, and didn't bother to defend your position after that. Because you didn't argue my point adequately, whether I am right or wrong, I have won the argument.