To: Jehu
I have disputed a great many of the tired canards you have come out with. You come out with far too many assertions that are so vague as to be almost meaningless for anyone to dispute them all.
When are you going to tell me why the suggested falsifications in Theobald's article would not falsify ToE?
Why do you on the one hand say that ToE is falsified by various arguments that you put forward and OTOH say that it is unfalsifiable and therefore not science? Which is it, then?
Do you even know what the theory of evolution is?
736 posted on
12/20/2004 11:03:42 AM PST by
Thatcherite
(Conservative and Biblical Literalist are not synonymous)
To: Thatcherite
"When are you going to tell me why the suggested falsifications in Theobald's article would not falsify ToE?"
When you tell me how symbiotic relationships arose in nature without using teleology. (Yucca plant, Yucca moth) Try coming up with an idea yourself that is not written by someone else...just raw logic, since your theory seems to explain EVERYTHING. This should be a snap for a genius like you to explain to a primitive like me.
739 posted on
12/20/2004 11:18:02 AM PST by
Jehu
To: Thatcherite
"When are you going to tell me why the suggested falsifications in Theobald's article would not falsify ToE?"
When you tell me how symbiotic relationships arose in nature without using teleology. (Yucca plant, Yucca moth) Try coming up with an idea yourself that is not written by someone else...just raw logic, since your theory seems to explain EVERYTHING. This should be a snap for a genius like you to explain to a primitive like me.
740 posted on
12/20/2004 11:19:09 AM PST by
Jehu
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson