They distort the reliability of dating techniques without mentioning that the techniques being attacked are verified by other techniques.
Ignoring the impossibility of the Grand Canyon being formed in less than a year.
Distorting the geologic column sequence to fit the flood.
Make up silly modifications to existing observations such as the speed of light.
How many more do you want?
The only way creationism will work is if all disciplines of science are false. Yet without that very science, the computer I am using right now would not work.
None of those incidences are false. Merely different ways of looking at the evidence. Would your computer work if there was a mutation in the software?
Why couldn't the Grand Canyon form in a short time given enough rushing water?