To: Know your rights
"Right now, the Supreme Court is definitely oriented towards state rights," like a states right to make its own laws on the death penalty??
2 posted on
03/04/2005 5:17:12 PM PST by
GeronL
(Condi will not be mistaken for a cleaning lady)
To: Know your rights
Still flooding the board with potlove eh?
3 posted on
03/04/2005 5:19:20 PM PST by
G32
To: Know your rights; G32
All right! A WOD thread. I was bored, but now I'm gonna make popcorn and watch the........
Nah.
5 posted on
03/04/2005 5:23:09 PM PST by
BullDog108
(Conservatives believe in God. Liberals think they are God.)
To: Know your rights
Seems like if SCOTUS goes the right way on this, it could set a precedent for starting to restrict the Commerce Clause back to its original intent.
We'll just have to see whether the conservative court members can be more pro-Constitution than anti-drug.
8 posted on
03/04/2005 5:26:52 PM PST by
Turbopilot
(Viva la Reagan Revolucion!)
To: Know your rights
Who cares. When are they going to pass medicinal heroin?
9 posted on
03/04/2005 5:32:33 PM PST by
Imaverygooddriver
(I`m a very good driver and I approve this message.)
To: Know your rights
Man, they're just wai..ting f o r th..e r igh t tim..e maaaaaan....
12 posted on
03/04/2005 5:42:47 PM PST by
brooklin
To: Know your rights
Ah, but the Kyoto Treaty against greenhouse gases will be the reason California's law will be declared null and void. ;-)
To: Know your rights
Marijuana decision expected any dayDude, I'll be right on it -- after I get some Cheetos. I have a real case of the munchies, man.
25 posted on
03/04/2005 6:01:36 PM PST by
AmishDude
(‘FREE [INSERT YOUR FETID TOTALITARIAN BASKET-CASE HERE]’. Not in your name? Don’t worry, it’s not.)
To: Know your rights; Sandy
"Right now, the Supreme Court is definitely oriented towards state rights," said campaign director Hilary McQuie. "I don't want to make a bet, but that more than any other factor could be in favor of the Reich decision." He does have a point with respect to the Lopez and VAWA cases, but I will be very surprised if they rule in favor of Raich.
You could end up on general welfare by betting on the USSC making a principled decision.
49 posted on
03/04/2005 8:44:02 PM PST by
Ken H
To: Annie03; Baby Bear; BJClinton; BlackbirdSST; Blue Jays; BroncosFan; Capitalism2003; dAnconia; ...
Libertarian ping.To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here.
111 posted on
03/05/2005 2:35:23 AM PST by
freepatriot32
(Jacques Chirac and Kofi Annan, a pantomime horse in which both men are playing the rear end. M.Steyn)
To: Know your rights; Quick1; WindOracle; gdani; PaxMacian; tacticalogic
You'd think an opportunity to dismantle a huge part of the Federal Leviathan (namely, the liberal interpretation of the Commerce Clause) would be of interest to Conservatives. But then I forgot, Big Government uber alles when it comes to the demon weed.
The case is a slam dunk. The Court will side with the Feds. And I hope all the "Conservatives" don't start whining when the precedent is used to shoot down State anti-abortion and gun freedom laws.
113 posted on
03/05/2005 4:34:13 AM PST by
Wolfie
To: Know your rights
148 posted on
03/06/2005 10:32:52 AM PST by
ApesForEvolution
(I just took a Muhammad and wiped my Jihadist with Mein Koran...come and get me nutbags.)
To: Know your rights
Like states have the right to make their own laws on abortion? How 'bout sodomy?
199 posted on
03/09/2005 5:15:17 PM PST by
Eva
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson