I have, and I've apologized where I was wrong instead of trying to pretend I never said it.
But that's not the point. The point is that the anti-life side of this argument is, contrary to the premise of the thread, not exclusive of illogic, incivility, or any of the other dishonest tactics that the initial post condemns.
You proved it the moment you hit "post". Ponder that a while and maybe you will learn to see those of us who are against the starvation of Terri Schiavo are not a bunch of emotionally-driven hysterics, but in fact just as rational and logical and fact-based as those on your side of the debate.
I apologize for posting my flame.