[Spiff]

How come it is always your side demanding the bannings. I haven't used profanity, just pointing out my arguement that I don't support the minutemen, that I beleive there may be some radical elements entwined within them, and that a guest worker program where people are documented would work better than building a new 2,000 mile Berlin wall.

But you've been using outright lies and dishonesty to do it and you've allied yourself with an admitted ACLU Democrat who is on a "jihad" to "beat up" conservatives and Republicans.

[Dane]

But you've been using outright lies and dishonesty to do it and you've allied yourself with an admitted ACLU Democrat who is on a "jihad" to "beat up" conservatives and Republicans

Paranoia runs deep into your mind it will creep.

BTW, I'm not on the ACLU's side either.

[ClintonBeGone]

But you've been using outright lies and dishonesty to do it and you've allied yourself with an admitted ACLU Democrat who is on a "jihad" to "beat up" conservatives and Republicans.

Why is it OK to attack Dane for his supposed "alliances" when you seem to beg for a pass every time someone uncovers something negative about the minutement or an allied group?