Joshua Farver and his teacher Susan Perry display the card they made to be sent to Terri Schindler-Schiavo. Photo Credit: Chris Mitchell
Posted on 05/14/2005 2:09:03 PM PDT by Future Useless Eater
Just like you don't believe the things you read, I look at the source and I don't believe the facts as their stating it. I don't believe this man talks or anything else like it. There is no way a wife would order the feeding tube removed from a spouse who can communicate. Not only wouldn't it happen, the laws wouldn't allow it to happen. I'm going to do my own research on this, because it doesn't pass the smell test.
OK, what is the PC term you think we should use?
Joshua Farver and his teacher Susan Perry display the card they made to be sent to Terri Schindler-Schiavo. Photo Credit: Chris Mitchell
WWII wasn't any of our business either.
Beautiful.. :'-)
You're right about that.
Thing is the courts should not have the authority to end a life of a person who has not been convicted of a crime.
You mean we have the right to kill our spouses?
How about the law? You left out the law ~ are you seriously arguing that murder among consenting adults is OK?
The moderator you fooled on that thread last night didn't realize how devious you were until a later poster who joined just today started talking about the detailed content of a post he claims he hadn't seen.
That meant that YOU informed him. Although you claimed to be offended and upset, and it was wrong and all that, you couldn't control yourself enough to keep from broadcasting the story.
That's why I'm starting out this thread with a complaint to the Moderator to the effect that you are a chronic complainant who is not really interested in eliminating a supposedly offending post ~ just one who wants to harrass other posters with deletion notices.
It is! I know kids like this. The original article said that many of the kids in this class had a feeding tube.
Florida law does not protect the life of a person who is in good health from having their feeding tube removed. Sad to think one of them could end up being starved.
http://www.dcmsonline.org/jax-medicine/2001journals/May2001/choices.htm
This makes a good synopsis on the law.
Well, we have the right
to just laugh at people who
twist words pointlessly!
BTW, you still planning on murdering me?
Pot-kettle-black.
This is the last time I'm going to address you because you are a disturbed human being, but I will set the record straight. I did not say anything to any moderator. Fools don't bother me, they always show the world just how foolish they are so why would I report you and stop you from doing what you do best...like you are now. Yes, and accusing me of killing my Father is something that did offend me...but it says more about you, don't you get that?
Since when did deciding whether or not to murder your inconvenient spouse by dehydration become a medical decision???
You described two different ways your father died on two different threads.
No doubt you will come up with a third for this thread. There are probably yet other ways he died reported on other threads in the past.
It's Florida law. "Sustenance and hydration" are considered medical treatments in Florida law. Until that law is changed, these incidents will continue to happen.
Your interpretation of my description of my Father's death is so outrageous, insulting and beyond contempt. You truly need help, and I hope you get it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.