Creationists are sometimes attacked by theistic evolutionists who feel that Creationists are devoid of reason. And they feel that way, at least in part, because they look at the science of radiometric dating and the widespread acceptance of evolution in the scientific fields, as well as the acceptance of evolution by the Roman Catholic church.
The above represents, I believe, a well reasoned argument in favor of Creation as opposed theistic evolution. It is not reasoned from science as a base, but from scripture as a base.
I believe that science will ultimately be proved compatible with the Word of God and that it is not necessary and wrong to try to force the Word of God to be compatible with man's limited scientific understanding.
1 posted on
05/20/2005 1:28:40 PM PDT by
DannyTN
To: Tribune7; wallcrawlr
some links may not work. Some punctuation may not have been edited to match the original correctly.
And I wish I had changed orange to blue or found a darker orange.
2 posted on
05/20/2005 1:30:18 PM PDT by
DannyTN
To: The Ghost of FReepers Past; ohioWfan; Tribune7; Tolkien; bondserv; GrandEagle; ...
DannyTN has done a good job of finding resources for us.
Creation ping list
See my profile for info
3 posted on
05/20/2005 1:32:54 PM PDT by
wallcrawlr
(http://www.bionicear.com)
To: DannyTN
4 posted on
05/20/2005 1:34:08 PM PDT by
GarySpFc
(Sneakypete, De Oppresso Liber)
To: DannyTN
6 posted on
05/20/2005 1:44:55 PM PDT by
ColoCdn
(Neco eos omnes, Deus suos agnoset)
To: DannyTN
MY EYES!! I'm BLIND!!! All those hideous yellow-mustard lettering has melted my retinas!!
7 posted on
05/20/2005 1:46:08 PM PDT by
Blzbba
(Let them hate us as long as they fear us - Caligula)
To: DannyTN
(Of course, if there is no free will, in the sense of voluntarily initiating thought, then it follows that Provine really couldn't help believing this! Rather, his beliefs are fully determined by deterministic laws of brain chemistry.) This is a prime example of evos not being able to live consistently with their own belief system.
12 posted on
05/20/2005 2:10:16 PM PDT by
Dataman
To: DannyTN
What's the problem with theistic evolution?
Well, fundamentally, it tries to cram a universe-sized God into a man-sized box....
14 posted on
05/20/2005 3:40:40 PM PDT by
Hegemony Cricket
(I have learned to deal with change. Any possibility of letting me try some currency?)
To: DannyTN
Kopernicus and friend were young-earth creationists.... Um. Were there any other kind of people in Galileo's time? This was centuries before Darwin or even the old-earth geologists who preceded him.
17 posted on
05/21/2005 1:09:55 AM PDT by
springing interest
(So Galileo was young-earth creationist....)
To: DannyTN; Tribune7; wallcrawlr
20 posted on
05/21/2005 6:34:17 AM PDT by
ohioWfan
("If My people, which are called by My name, will humble themselves and pray.....")
To: DannyTN
Why is this in the smokey back room?
24 posted on
05/26/2005 8:01:21 PM PDT by
AndrewC
To: DannyTN
I have actually met Ken Ham!
Nice guy, asked the audience who has tasted vegamite, I almost puked, he saw me and chuckled.
29 posted on
06/18/2005 7:32:57 PM PDT by
RaceBannon
((Prov 28:1 KJV) The wicked flee when no man pursueth: but the righteous are bold as a lion.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson