To: EternalVigilance
wasn't the issue whether or not she was reacting to her parents and watching that balloon floating around her room? She should not be allowed to die... No the the issue was that she wasn't "allowed to die", she was executed.
I don't care if her brain was on Micheal's dresser, starving disabled people to death is a line that shouldn't be crossed.
Now, who lives and who dies is just some judge's opinion as to what constitutes a "useless eater".
14 posted on
06/18/2005 2:32:52 AM PDT by
dinasour
(Pajamahadeen)
To: dinasour
16 posted on
06/18/2005 2:52:31 AM PDT by
EternalVigilance
('Quality of Life': another name for the slippery slope into barbarism...)
To: dinasour
I don't care if her brain was on Micheal's dresser, starving disabled people to death is a line that shouldn't be crossed.LOL, well put. And therein lies the point, which Boortz is completely sidestepping.
89 posted on
06/18/2005 7:12:23 AM PDT by
agrace
(All I have seen teaches me to trust the Creator for all I have not seen. - Ralph Waldo Emerson)
To: dinasour
Wrong. Its the people's opinion. You know, majority rules and that kind of thing (I think they still call it democracy). We elect judges, senators, presidents, etc..and we can UN-elect them.
249 posted on
06/19/2005 12:40:52 AM PDT by
Windsong
(FighterPilot)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson