Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

I hope she wins but even if she does the supreme court will just overturn the verdict so no other peons would get uppity with thier masters.
1 posted on 08/21/2005 10:03:52 AM PDT by freepatriot32
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Wolfie

ping


2 posted on 08/21/2005 10:04:12 AM PDT by freepatriot32 (Deep within every dilemma is a solution that involves explosives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Allosaurs_r_us; Abram; AlexandriaDuke; Annie03; Baby Bear; bassmaner; Bernard; BJClinton; ...
Libertarian ping.To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here
3 posted on 08/21/2005 10:04:40 AM PDT by freepatriot32 (Deep within every dilemma is a solution that involves explosives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freepatriot32

Gee whiz! Keep us posted on these interesting developments.


4 posted on 08/21/2005 10:06:47 AM PDT by CBart95
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freepatriot32

More liberal "we are above the law and we define the law by law suit".


5 posted on 08/21/2005 10:06:53 AM PDT by tallhappy (Juntos Podemos!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freepatriot32
Medical pot activist may sue over bust at airport

I have a bust of Julius Caesar in my office.

6 posted on 08/21/2005 10:10:53 AM PDT by DeeOhGee (Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freepatriot32

Your a**hole government at work keeping you safe and the Drug War Warriors employed!


8 posted on 08/21/2005 10:17:25 AM PDT by jackieaxe (English speaking, law abiding, taxpaying citizen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freepatriot32
California Attorney General Bill Lockyer issued a statement saying the ruling had no impact on the validity of the California law

The states are perfectly within their rights to refuse to enforce unconstitutional federal laws, according to Thomas Jefferson and James Madison in the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions of 1798. It is a necessary - nay, critical - part of states' rights and the sovereignty of the individual states defending against an encroaching federal government.

10 posted on 08/21/2005 10:31:50 AM PDT by DeeOhGee (Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freepatriot32
First let me say I've never smoked marijuana in my life, but I'm still in favor of the state law allowing marijuana for medical use, and I see the Federal ruling as an infringement on state's rights. That being said, we're all blowing smoke unless we know what code section she was cited for violating. Unfortunatley, the newspaper report, in the typical manmer of MSM, failed to include that crucial detail.
13 posted on 08/21/2005 12:56:21 PM PDT by RLM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freepatriot32
"Our primary concern is the police appeared to be under the impression the Compassionate Use Act was no longer in effect in California," Alvarez said.

Figures.

20 posted on 08/22/2005 6:46:56 AM PDT by FOG724 (RINOS - they are not better than leftists, they ARE leftists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freepatriot32
"Corral said she typically takes marijuana with her when traveling in California, but not to other states."

Then how "medically necessary" can it be?

What a joke.

21 posted on 08/22/2005 7:07:32 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson