I hope she wins but even if she does the supreme court will just overturn the verdict so no other peons would get uppity with thier masters.
To: Wolfie
2 posted on
08/21/2005 10:04:12 AM PDT by
freepatriot32
(Deep within every dilemma is a solution that involves explosives)
To: Allosaurs_r_us; Abram; AlexandriaDuke; Annie03; Baby Bear; bassmaner; Bernard; BJClinton; ...
Libertarian ping.To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here
3 posted on
08/21/2005 10:04:40 AM PDT by
freepatriot32
(Deep within every dilemma is a solution that involves explosives)
To: freepatriot32
Gee whiz! Keep us posted on these interesting developments.
4 posted on
08/21/2005 10:06:47 AM PDT by
CBart95
To: freepatriot32
More liberal "we are above the law and we define the law by law suit".
5 posted on
08/21/2005 10:06:53 AM PDT by
tallhappy
(Juntos Podemos!)
To: freepatriot32
Medical pot activist may sue over bust at airportI have a bust of Julius Caesar in my office.
6 posted on
08/21/2005 10:10:53 AM PDT by
DeeOhGee
(Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati)
To: freepatriot32
Your a**hole government at work keeping you safe and the Drug War Warriors employed!
8 posted on
08/21/2005 10:17:25 AM PDT by
jackieaxe
(English speaking, law abiding, taxpaying citizen)
To: freepatriot32
California Attorney General Bill Lockyer issued a statement saying the ruling had no impact on the validity of the California lawThe states are perfectly within their rights to refuse to enforce unconstitutional federal laws, according to Thomas Jefferson and James Madison in the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions of 1798. It is a necessary - nay, critical - part of states' rights and the sovereignty of the individual states defending against an encroaching federal government.
10 posted on
08/21/2005 10:31:50 AM PDT by
DeeOhGee
(Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati)
To: freepatriot32
First let me say I've never smoked marijuana in my life, but I'm still in favor of the state law allowing marijuana for medical use, and I see the Federal ruling as an infringement on state's rights. That being said, we're all blowing smoke unless we know what code section she was cited for violating. Unfortunatley, the newspaper report, in the typical manmer of MSM, failed to include that crucial detail.
13 posted on
08/21/2005 12:56:21 PM PDT by
RLM
To: freepatriot32
"Our primary concern is the police appeared to be under the impression the Compassionate Use Act was no longer in effect in California," Alvarez said.Figures.
20 posted on
08/22/2005 6:46:56 AM PDT by
FOG724
(RINOS - they are not better than leftists, they ARE leftists.)
To: freepatriot32
"Corral said she typically takes marijuana with her when traveling in California, but not to other states."Then how "medically necessary" can it be?
What a joke.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson