[Just because *you're* entirely ignorant of the evidence doesn't mean it isn't there.] ..And just because *you're* sadly duped into believing such cultist B.S. doesn't mean it's evidence for anything.
Do even *you* believe this stuff that spews out of your brain?
And whether do you do or not, do you *really* believe that anyone is going to mistake your bizarre rant for an adequate rebuttal to the enormous amount of hard evidence contained in the link you're trying to blow off?
What's wrong with you folks? Do you find reality that hard to take a good look at?
Do you find reality that hard to take a good look at? Here's some reality. You'll probably appreciate this fellow (other folks might not). I think he's a handsome lad!
Fossil: KNM-WT 15000 
Site: Nariokotome, West Turkana, Kenya (1)
Discovered By: K. Kimeu, 1984 (1)
Estimated Age of Fossil: 1.6 mya * determined by Stratigraphic, faunal & radiometric data (1, 4)
Species Name: Homo ergaster (1, 7, 8), Homo erectus (3, 4, 7, 10), Homo erectus ergaster (25)
Gender: Male (based on pelvis, browridge) (1, 8, 9)
Cranial Capacity: 880 (909 as adult) cc (1)
Information: Most complete early hominid skeleton (80 bones and skull) (1, 8)
Interpretation: Hairless and dark pigmented body (based on environment, limb proportions) (7, 8, 9). Juvenile (9-12 based on 2nd molar eruption and unfused growth plates) (1, 3, 4, 7, 8). Juvenile (8 years old based on recent studies on tooth development) (27). Incapable of speech (based on narrowing of spinal canal in thoracic region) (1)
Nickname: Turkana Boy (1), Nariokotome Boy
See original source for notes:
Source: http://www.mos.org/evolution/fossils/fossilview.php?fid=38
What's wrong with you folks? Do you find reality that hard to take a good look at? LOL. Bro, these guys are laughing all the way to the bank. It's like people who bray at the NYT, et al as if they are worthy of actual debate. At some point, you have to realize that operetors will fill a market niche if there is sufficient demand.
There are enough America haters for the MSM to serve an audience, and there are enough dunderheads for the crevo charlatans to cater to as well. Heck, given the free-market orientaton of this Web site, one would think that a few evo experts would jump in the fray try and write a breathless 'insiders' view of the horrible Darwin mandated curricula they are forced to follow.
The supreme irony would be that they could then take these ill gotten gains to finance further scientific study.