I truly appreciate your posting a NOVEL, however it doesn't change the construct that TOE is only speculation.
You keep showing me little bits of evidence, but never the actual event, so therefore, speculation. I know you scientist can't stand being told you're not only wrong, but being lied too and deceived, is hard to take, but if you'd get your head out of your asses long enough to take a look at reality then maybe you'd get a clue...until then, keep playing with your little conjectures by calling them facts, and I'll keep informing people about the lie that's being perpetrated on society.
Which of the following do you consider to be not "only speculation"?
Please explain the difference between the evidence that supports the above and the evidence that supports the theory of evolution. Have you or anyone else ever seen an electron? Have you or anyone else visited another solar system to verify that the stars aren't just a painted backdrop a few million-miles away?
All of modern science is based on inferential evidence, and particularly on successful predictions of what will be found in the field that are made using scientific theories. Here are some made using the theory of evolution. If you want to insist on only using science that relies on direct observations of the theorised phenomena then best throw away the computer that you are sitting at, as the engineers who built it made copious use of scientific theories for which the only evidence is indirect and inferential, and that evidence is no more directly based than the vast avalanche of evidence that supports the theory of evolution.
I truly appreciate your posting a NOVEL, however it doesn't change the construct that TOE is only speculation.
The astute reader is invited to reread my original comment above. Was I right, or was I right?
You keep showing me little bits of evidence,
Actually, I show you massive volumes of evidence, which you continue to totally ignore with stupid dismissals like:
but never the actual event, so therefore, speculation.
Okay, I'll bite -- what, exactly, is "speculation" about the pattern of endogenous retroviruses? What about it has not actually been established by multiple lines of evidence beyond reasonable doubt? Be specific.
I know you scientist can't stand being told you're not only wrong, but being lied too and deceived,
Yes, we don't appreciate you telling falsehoods like that, then running away from invitations to actually support your empty accusations. We don't suffer fools gladly.
is hard to take, but if you'd get your head out of your asses long enough to take a look at reality then maybe you'd get a clue...
The evidence we show you *is* reality. It was acquired by carefully examining reality and then recording what is found there. *You're* the one who keeps giving airy hand-waving dismissals on why you don't even need to *glance* at that reality, much less deal with it.
Do you have *any* idea how self-deluded you sound?
until then, keep playing with your little conjectures by calling them facts, and I'll keep informing people about the lie that's being perpetrated on society.
Yes, you'll keep repeating your slanderous accusation without a shred of justification or support. We get it.