Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Report: Syria agrees to hide Iran nukes
World Tribune ^ | December 20, 2005

Posted on 12/20/2005 10:47:51 AM PST by West Coast Conservative

Syria has signed a pledge to store Iranian nuclear weapons and missiles.

The London-based Jane's Defence Weekly reported that Iran and Syria signed a strategic accord meant to protect either country from international pressure regarding their weapons programs. The magazine, citing diplomatic sources, said Syria agreed to store Iranian materials and weapons should Teheran come under United Nations sanctions.

Iran also pledged to grant haven to any Syrian intelligence officer indicted by the UN or Lebanon. Five Syrian officers have been questioned by the UN regarding the Hariri assassination, Middle East Newsline reported. "The sensitive chapter in the accord includes Syria's commitment to allow Iran to safely store weapons, sensitive equipment or even hazardous materials on Syrian soil should Iran need such help in a time of crisis," Jane's said.

The accord also obligated Syria to continue to supply the Iranian-sponsored Hizbullah with weapons, ammunition and communications. Iran has been the leading weapons supplier to Hizbullah, with about 15,000 missiles and rockets along the Israeli-Lebanese border.

The accord, negotiations of which began in 2004, was signed on Nov. 14 and meant to prepare for economic sanctions imposed on either Iran or Syria. Under the accord, Jane's said, Iran would relay financial aid to Syria in an effort to ease Western sanctions in wake of the UN determination that Damascus was responsible for the assassination of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik Hariri.

Iran also pledged to supply a range of military aid to Syria. Jane's cited technology for weapons of mass destruction as well as conventional arms, ammunition and training of Syrian military.

Teheran would seek to upgrade Syrian ballistic missiles and chemical weapons systems. Under the accord, Iran would also be prepared to operate "advanced weapon systems in Syria during a military confrontation." Jane's said.

"The new strategic accord is based on the existing military MoUs, with the addition of the sensitive chapter dealing with cooperation in times of international sanctions or military conflict," Jane's reported.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: axisofevil; iran; irannukes; nuclearweapons; syria; terrorism; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 321-338 next last
To: marlon
All we need is a casus belli...
21 posted on 12/20/2005 11:22:15 AM PST by null and void (Peace on Earth. Death to the Terrorists...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852

hush! it's a secret. shhhh!


22 posted on 12/20/2005 11:22:23 AM PST by kinghorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
Interesting strategy, but one that could work. Syria is pretty much an ally of Russia, so we will try to side step anything that has to do with them.

Iran knows this, and figures that if can get its nukes to Syria, the US will be lambasted if/when we take back Iran. That and the Iranian nukes have a much better shot of hitting Israel from Damascus than Tehran.

Of course if a nuke DOES hit Israel, regional nuclear war will start rather quickly. And we think we have high gas prices now!
23 posted on 12/20/2005 11:25:20 AM PST by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
Teheran would seek to upgrade Syrian ballistic missiles and chemical weapons systems. Under the accord, Iran would also be prepared to operate "advanced weapon systems in Syria during a military confrontation." Jane's said.

This is a hell of a lot more than a "storage pact"....this is a war alliance.

24 posted on 12/20/2005 11:26:44 AM PST by ScreamingFist ( The RKBA doesn't apply if I have a bigger gun than your bodyguard. NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

It seems as though all the business and monies we give to China is going to bite us in the ass someday. I wonder sometimes if we are just helping build arsenals against ourselves. What do we need the Chinese for anyway to build our stuff cheap? Thats what most of the products are too..Cheap Chinese crap. The more we buy the more we die...
The Russians surprise me as well. Why would they want to supply Muslims with arms?? They won't need any oil when there all dead. The French are dead already.Who cares..


25 posted on 12/20/2005 11:27:12 AM PST by Rick66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper

Just like they did with Saddams WMD


26 posted on 12/20/2005 11:28:12 AM PST by Mo1 (Republicans protect Americans from Terrorists. Democrats protect Terrorists from Americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

bump


27 posted on 12/20/2005 11:30:15 AM PST by Former Proud Canadian (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meanie monster
Yes they are. They think this is the endtimes:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1543865/posts?page=12#12

28 posted on 12/20/2005 11:31:38 AM PST by Former Proud Canadian (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Rick66
The Russians surprise me as well. Why would they want to supply Muslims with arms??

To fight proxy wars with the US and to develop a counter weight to all the former Soviet Bloc countries becoming our allies. Russia views the US as a much bigger threat then they do the muslims, to their own peril.

29 posted on 12/20/2005 11:35:00 AM PST by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
Syria agreed to store Iranian materials and weapons should Teheran come under United Nations sanctions.

Sounds great. We know the UN loves to impose sanction after sanction, rather than commit to action. Call for them right now. Moving the weapons and materials into Syria makes it a little easier for the Israelis to take them out while a follow up strike on the production facilities in Iran can be arranged.

30 posted on 12/20/2005 11:37:59 AM PST by edpc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rick66
Jealousy.

Old habits.
31 posted on 12/20/2005 11:55:01 AM PST by MeanWestTexan (Many at FR would respond to Christ "Darn right, I'll cast the first stone!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: TexasRepublic

Syria should be first, really.

1. More vulnerable internally.
2. Weaker miltarily
3. Smaller
4. Poorer
5. We have them effectively surrounded, counting Israel.
6. Easier to make the case, given how they funnel terrorists into Iraq.

Iran would be more difficult to occupy, as well, unless we use the new Iraqi army we build up in a few years.


32 posted on 12/20/2005 11:57:41 AM PST by MeanWestTexan (Many at FR would respond to Christ "Darn right, I'll cast the first stone!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

"...Behold! Damascus is taken away from being a city, and it shall be a ruinous heap."


33 posted on 12/20/2005 11:58:03 AM PST by sheik yerbouty ( Make America and the world a jihad free zone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

I saw this on Drudge too. Why not they hid them for Iraq! I still believe that is where the WMD's are. Even though President Bush agrees they were never there. Which I think was wrong of Bush to do.


34 posted on 12/20/2005 12:06:03 PM PST by GrandmaC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

just let the U.N keep talking


35 posted on 12/20/2005 12:15:46 PM PST by cope85
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper

Just got done meeting with our NWYC rep.

He says he won't be surprised if we don't see Syria getting attacked by Israel in Jan. because of the missile system Syria will be getting from Russia.


36 posted on 12/20/2005 12:33:02 PM PST by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: redgolum
Of course if a nuke DOES hit Israel,

I'm holding out for it to polish the Dome of the Rock off the temple mount, clearing the way for the Third Temple...

37 posted on 12/20/2005 12:36:04 PM PST by null and void (Peace on Earth. Death to the Terrorists...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA
I've been sensing a strike from Israel as well. Israel has been rattling it's sword lately, particularly among the candidates for prime minister in Israel's ongoing election campaign.

I've heard it could either by Syria or Iran, but I'm placing a bet on Syria.

38 posted on 12/20/2005 12:37:11 PM PST by BigSkyFreeper (Luke 2 : 8-14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper

Yeah, our NWYC guy was saying SoS rice was trying to get Putin to stop the sale of Iskander Missiles to Syria.


39 posted on 12/20/2005 12:53:15 PM PST by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

Here's an interesting thought: how can a country become a regional superpower, complete with WMD, without the difficulty and expense of their own R&D programs? Simple: let Iran and Iraq do the hard work, and then just offer to "store" their results in your own bunkers.


40 posted on 12/20/2005 12:55:52 PM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 321-338 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson