"Of course, I'm not really sure if that's what he wants, or if he just wants to have a big circle jerk with the evo crowd."
Lovely characterization. Is that kind of language inspired by your faith, too?
"But look, you can certainly shoot down anything I say, because it happened to someone else. That's the nature of faith. Or 'knowledge'."
No, it's the lack of your applying empiricism to your correlation.
"So what are you going to say when it happens to you?"
When WHAT happens to me? Are you saying that I must be addicted to something?
It's vivid and it accurately portrays my point.
No, it's the lack of your applying empiricism to your correlation.
Since when did I claim to be empirical in my reasoning? It's subjective, and that's the logic I used to shoot down those definitions.
When WHAT happens to me? Are you saying that I must be addicted to something?
The human condition, of which you are subject, consists of far more than just addictions.
You mean you're NOT addicted to Free Republic? ;-)
Cheers!