To: Jo Nuvark
Even as a grade schooler, I could see there was a huge gap in evidence filled in with wishful thinking and artistic imagination.
Perhaps you could substantiate your claim by pointing out specific deficiences in the evidence presented for evolution rather than relating vague anecdotal tales.
609 posted on
02/20/2006 5:00:58 PM PST by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: Dimensio
[...substantiate your claim by pointing out specific deficiences in the evidence presented for evolution rather than relating vague anecdotal tales...]
This personal "anecdote" is a fact that I observed. Which is more than I can
say for some scientists. Evidence should be observable, repeatable and documentable.
620 posted on
02/20/2006 5:21:51 PM PST by
Jo Nuvark
((Those who bless Israel will be blessed, those who curse Israel will be cursed. Gen 12:3))
To: Dimensio; Jo Nuvark; nmh
Well 'artists concept' does not qualify as evidence for one.
He saw the exhibits, I did too. That's eyewitness testimony, not something you twist into 'vague anecdotal tales'. But twisting is pretty much what you are about. Its not our fault the evolutionists want to wipe away parts of their legacy.
You still have your artists concepts, for one look at the dino-raptor illustrations against the fossils
622 posted on
02/20/2006 5:24:05 PM PST by
RunningWolf
(Vet US Army Air Cav 1975)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson