Something smells rotten in Denmark here. Is this the state protecting citizens or another bald-faced money grab? Discuss.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
To: steel_resolve
Bottom line: 1) It's money. 2) We want it. 3) It's ours.
To: steel_resolve
Even if the guy just cashed his paycheck at the bank, and is in a hurry to get somewhere? This is wrong.
3 posted on
03/08/2006 10:04:20 AM PST by
stuartcr
(Everything happens as God wants it to.....otherwise, things would be different.)
To: steel_resolve
So what's the normal level of cocaine that's acceptable on currency?
4 posted on
03/08/2006 10:05:42 AM PST by
Sax
To: steel_resolve
To: steel_resolve; freepatriot32
IB4TBL
Ping
I think I've read before that 98% of paper money has cocaine traces on it.
8 posted on
03/08/2006 10:07:51 AM PST by
SandfleaCSC
( “Alcohol may be man's worst enemy, but the bible says love your enemy.”)
To: steel_resolve
This is the thinnest veil yet I have seen for an outright theft from citizens by law enforcement - and an excellent example of how the WoD leads to the degradation of all law and respect for the law in this country.
10 posted on
03/08/2006 10:08:49 AM PST by
thoughtomator
(I understand Democrats' impatience; If Kerry were President, Iran would have nuked Israel by now)
To: steel_resolve
Another good reason for "money laundering"!
12 posted on
03/08/2006 10:10:56 AM PST by
Philistone
(Turning lead into gold...)
To: steel_resolve
13 posted on
03/08/2006 10:11:52 AM PST by
VOA
To: steel_resolve
Without other evidence I'd have to go with "Give it back".
Most times I have less than $20 on me but a few times I had over $10K. It's mine and I worked hard for it. If the law wants it, prove it in court.
15 posted on
03/08/2006 10:16:15 AM PST by
PeteB570
(Guns, what real men want for Christmas)
To: steel_resolve
Cash with far higher-than-normal trace levels of cocaine can be seized as contraband from speeding drivers, a divided state appeals court ruled today. Pretty amazing stuff. Just the fact that money has a trace amount of cocaine on it means that some will have more and some will have less. All it would take would be to have a few bills with extra cocaine on it - or, even worse, a crooked cop sprinkling a bit of cocaine on seized cash - and the money goes to the police.
Yet another hole blasted into basic constitutional protections.
17 posted on
03/08/2006 10:16:43 AM PST by
dirtboy
(I'm fat, I sleep most of the winter and I saw my shadow yesterday. Does that make me a groundhog?)
To: steel_resolve
Nobody owns their money. The government just lets us carry some around until they want it back.
19 posted on
03/08/2006 10:18:57 AM PST by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: steel_resolve
This needs to be appealed all the way up. These drug warrior psychos must be stopped.
21 posted on
03/08/2006 10:20:58 AM PST by
mysterio
To: steel_resolve
This is not even rational. People USING cocaine MAY use the pills to ingest it, but the people BUYING and SELLING the cocaine in high dollar transactions as described here, even if they are users, are probably NOT using THAT PARTICULAR money to snort it. Think about it, they are probably raising or borrowing that money via organized crime and holding it briefly, so why would one even expect it to be contaminated any more than any other money? Makes no sense at all...
27 posted on
03/08/2006 10:27:59 AM PST by
LambSlave
(The truth will set you free)
To: robertpaulsen; Mojave
I would hope that even you guys would be on the side of us loserdopians on this one.
34 posted on
03/08/2006 10:33:19 AM PST by
jmc813
(Sanford/Pence in '08)
To: steel_resolve
39 posted on
03/08/2006 10:41:52 AM PST by
mrsmith
To: steel_resolve
Reminds me of a test done many years ago, involving cocaine cash and drug sniffing dogs. While the cameras running, an officer hides cash in the vehicle, another officer comes around with the dog. Dog picks up on hidden money, the other officer takes the money and holds it out for the camera. at the same time the dog goes over to the first officer, and tries to get into this pocket. That officer removes a small wad of bills, that tested positive for cocaine residue.
44 posted on
03/08/2006 10:57:57 AM PST by
Graycliff
(Long haired freaky people, need not apply.)
To: steel_resolve
From the article:
"Cash with far higher-than-normal trace levels of cocaine can be seized ...."
Okay; fair is fair -- I propose the first people whose money should be tested for cocaine residue should be the legislators who voted for this law.
49 posted on
03/08/2006 11:27:15 AM PST by
longshadow
(FReeper #405, entering his ninth year of ignoring nitwits, nutcases, and recycled newbies)
To: albertp; Allosaurs_r_us; Abram; AlexandriaDuke; Americanwolf; Annie03; Baby Bear; bassmaner; ...
Libertarian ping.To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here
52 posted on
03/08/2006 11:31:12 AM PST by
freepatriot32
(Holding you head high & voting Libertarian is better then holding your nose and voting republican)
To: steel_resolve
...shall not be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process...
55 posted on
03/08/2006 11:35:41 AM PST by
LIConFem
(A fronte praecipitium, a tergo lupi.)
To: steel_resolve; inneroutlaw
"Excuse me, citizen, but I clocked you at 47 mph in a 45 zone back there. May I see your driver's license, proof of insurance, registration, smoking license, hamburger license, cell phone license,soft drink license, audio equipment license, proof that your vehicle has not been modified to defeat breathalyzer, seatbelt, airbag, attention deficit disorder requirements? Oh, by the way, give me all your cash, and prepare to forfeit your vehicle."
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson