Skip to comments.
Newly found species fills evolutionary gap between fish and land animals
EurekAlert (AAAS) ^
| 05 April 2006
| Staff
Posted on 04/05/2006 10:32:31 AM PDT by PatrickHenry
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 1,501-1,512 next last
To: PatrickHenry
Interesting read, but what would REALLY spark my interest, and what the article fails to mention, is how they breathed. Gills? Lungs? Somewhere in between? What?
Ah well.
BTW, nice tag line.
21
posted on
04/05/2006 10:51:13 AM PDT
by
roaddog727
(P=3/8 A. or, P=plenty...............)
To: PatrickHenry
Great. All they've done is create two new gaps on either side of the previous one...
22
posted on
04/05/2006 10:53:55 AM PDT
by
null and void
(We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, therefore, is not an act but a habit. - Aristotle)
To: yellowdoghunter
It is a scientific theory. There is a significance difference that you should understand.
23
posted on
04/05/2006 10:54:05 AM PDT
by
hawkaw
To: Jeff Chandler
[ Newly found species fills evolutionary gap between fish and land animals. ]
Actually shes the link between Buckwheat and Weezie on the Jeffersons..
24
posted on
04/05/2006 10:54:55 AM PDT
by
hosepipe
(CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole..)
To: PatrickHenry
25
posted on
04/05/2006 10:54:58 AM PDT
by
hawkaw
To: <1/1,000,000th%
So, did it taste like chicken, or fish?
26
posted on
04/05/2006 10:55:23 AM PDT
by
muawiyah
(-)
To: PatrickHenry
Uhhh, and then we find the occasional viral sequence in the genome of an animal up the "tree of life" from others who don't have that viral sequence.
That means genetic information can be acquired by critters independent of the "tree of life" formulation.
That doesn't make Creationism correct (obviously), but it does suggest that doctrinaire adherence to a rigid, self-contained "tree of life" mantra really isn't theologically diferent from the Creationist point of view.
Gad!
27
posted on
04/05/2006 10:58:29 AM PDT
by
muawiyah
(-)
To: PatrickHenry
According to the numbers provided here the land mass once located almost 6,000 miles away 375 million years ago had to move at a rate of 2.2 inches per year toward the north pole; is that correct?
28
posted on
04/05/2006 11:01:21 AM PDT
by
Old Professer
(The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
To: muawiyah
Uhhh, and then we find the occasional viral sequence in the genome of an animal up the "tree of life" from others who don't have that viral sequence. That means genetic information can be acquired by critters independent of the "tree of life" formulation.
by viruses for example
To: bobdsmith
Or, by, for example, recombinant DNA technology.
30
posted on
04/05/2006 11:04:37 AM PDT
by
muawiyah
(-)
To: PatrickHenry
If this is even half as big a discovery as this makes it appear, why are nothing other than small fringe sites carrying it?
31
posted on
04/05/2006 11:04:42 AM PDT
by
NapkinUser
(Secure our borders, no amnesty.)
To: RightWingAtheist
which is not a mint, but a Finnish pop band. "Fin"nish?
Doesn't that describe a critter that has fins but can walk with jointed bones on land?
32
posted on
04/05/2006 11:05:26 AM PDT
by
Experiment 6-2-6
(Admn Mods: tiny, malicious things that glare and gibber from dark corners.They have pins and dolls..)
To: Mikey_1962
33
posted on
04/05/2006 11:05:50 AM PDT
by
NapkinUser
(Secure our borders, no amnesty.)
To: PatrickHenry
I wanted to add earlier, but didn't, that this is another case of SLOPPY WRITING. If the spot was on the Equator, then it was TROPICAL, not SUBTROPICAL. And, no, Brazil does not have a SUBTROPICAL climate.
34
posted on
04/05/2006 11:06:12 AM PDT
by
muawiyah
(-)
To: PatrickHenry
Sounds like it lived on Dagobah.
35
posted on
04/05/2006 11:08:27 AM PDT
by
colorado tanker
(We need more "chicken-bleep Democrats" in the Senate!)
To: NapkinUser
36
posted on
04/05/2006 11:10:11 AM PDT
by
CarolinaGuitarman
("Things are not what they always seem.")
To: yellowdoghunter
Just always good to remind people that evolution is just a theory....:) Makes you feel better, doesnt it?
To: yellowdoghunter
Just remember, evolution is ONLY a theory. Wrong: A scientific theory is of a higher order than proof or a fact. Evolution is a observed fact, the explanation of the observed fact (evolution) is the Theory of Evolution.
38
posted on
04/05/2006 11:11:06 AM PDT
by
jec41
(Screaming Eagle)
To: Calpernia
Yep. The various types of lungfish can breath air, and the African lungfish (aka Mudfish) can stay out of water for months and 'walk' on pectoral fins. There are also other types of air-breathing/land-'walking' fish eg the other types of lungfish, walking catfish, mudskippers, and bennies. I believe Bowfins can gulp air (although they do not 'walk' on land), and obviously there is the Northern Snakehead (which can breath air for several days, and while it doesn't use its fins for 'walking' it can wriggle from pond to pond).
All these fish are alive today, thus I'm wondering what the significance of this find is.
39
posted on
04/05/2006 11:11:32 AM PDT
by
spetznaz
(Nuclear-tipped Ballistic Missiles: The Ultimate Phallic Symbol)
To: Old Professer
Well, I suspect the total motion is less than 6,000 miles as Ellesmere Island isn't RIGHT at the north pole today, and it didn't have to be RIGHT at the equator...just near it...375 million years ago. so maybe actually 5,000 miles.
But 2.2 inches a year is a typical plate motion speed; North America is moving about that fast right now. The fastest plate in the world is moving over 9 inches a year.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 1,501-1,512 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson