To: CarolinaGuitarman
Again, the initial features that develop and subsequently compete ARE random (mutations are, by definition, random). Just because the process that takes place AFTER those features develop is not random does not make the over all process non-random.
To: newguy357
"Again, the initial features that develop and subsequently compete ARE random (mutations are, by definition, random). Just because the process that takes place AFTER those features develop is not random does not make the over all process non-random."
I didn't say there were no random elements involved. Certainly there are. But the selection process itself is not random.
179 posted on
05/12/2006 1:42:44 PM PDT by
CarolinaGuitarman
("There is grandeur in this view of life....")
To: newguy357
mutations are, by definition, randomNot by definition, but by experimental observation.
In fact, Lamarckists thought that mutations were triggered in a way that would better adapt future generations to the environment.
And there is "theistic" or "guided" evolution, which claims that the beneficial mutations were put there by a hypothetical designer.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson