To: mlc9852
What they conveniently fail to mention is that Eugenie Scott is a self-professed atheist. So he evidently eats small children and tortures animals? What has his being an atheist to do with the validity of the website he directs?
Oh, I get it. Ad hominem. If you can't counter the ideas, insinuate the ideas' holder is a bad man. Typical liberal strategy, but it should work with the relatively ignorant masses.
23 posted on
05/12/2006 12:30:26 PM PDT by
Junior
(Identical fecal matter, alternate diurnal period)
To: Junior
Well, just so long everyone knows that Dr. Scott is the director and an atheist. It is always good to understand who you are dealing with and what their agenda might be. In this case, Dr. Scott's agenda is crystal clear.
25 posted on
05/12/2006 12:37:17 PM PDT by
mlc9852
To: Junior
Oh, I get it. Ad hominem. If you can't counter the ideas, insinuate the ideas' holder is a bad man. Typical liberal strategy, but it should work with the relatively ignorant masses. Did you see js1138's post 16 in this thread?
Cheers!
465 posted on
05/12/2006 9:55:45 PM PDT by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
To: Junior
So he evidently eats small children and tortures animals? What has his being an atheist to do with the validity of the website he directs? She -- her.
Eugenie Scott, PhD
Executive Director of the NCSE
549 posted on
05/13/2006 3:55:21 AM PDT by
dread78645
(Evolution. A dying theory since 1859.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson