Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: shuckmaster

shuck: "I believe what the author is saying is that medical or agricultural science would still be in the dark ages if not for the theory of evolution. That of course is the truth."

This must be the same line of reasoning that got us to the doctrine of evolution in the first place.

Scientific method was founded long, long before the theory of evolution came to be widely accepted. The same is true of biological science. To say that biological sciences hinge on the concept of macro-evolution is perposterous.


85 posted on 05/12/2006 1:07:29 PM PDT by visually_augmented (I was blind, but now I see)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]


To: visually_augmented
To say that biological sciences hinge on the concept of macro-evolution is perposterous.

What the heck is macro-evolution?

158 posted on 05/12/2006 1:29:00 PM PDT by shuckmaster (An oak tree is an acorns way of making more acorns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson