Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Richard Kimball

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ontogeny_recapitulates_phylogeny


62 posted on 05/20/2006 6:56:52 PM PDT by P.O.E.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: P.O.E.
Very good article. It explains nicely what's really going on and the fallacy of science-deniers waving Haeckel around.
67 posted on 05/20/2006 7:00:33 PM PDT by VadeRetro (Faster than a speeding building; able to leap tall bullets at a single bound!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

To: P.O.E.

Thanks for the response. The Wiki gives what I had originally thought. The theory was developed in the 1860's, has been discarded, but still gets brought out, probably because people read it in a book, put it in a new book, etc. Although I'm a creationist, I don't see the discrediting of this hurting evolutionary theory in the least. Nothing of what I understand about evolution demands this process during the pre-birth phase.


85 posted on 05/20/2006 7:28:37 PM PDT by Richard Kimball (I like to make everyone's day a little more surreal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson