Talkorigin is often quite deceitful & known for leaving out important info when trying to make their case- Try Trueorigin.com for rebuttles to their biased info. Free to dispute? Oh, their assertions have been prattyy thoroughly disputed with scientific evidences- the problem with talkorigins is that they present half-truths in an effort to malign I.D-ers instead of being objective scientists & simply presenting what they beleive to be evidences open to discussion- as such talkorigin often makes fools of themselves as the site I mentioned trueorigin.com takes science and disputes their site quite thoroughly- We've looked into the claims of evolutionsits Dimensio- extensively. Scientific proof for evolution has a huge barrier that they MUST jump if they are to prove evolution & that barrier is the 'kind begets kind' problem- in order for kind to beget non-kind, gene transference MUST take place- otherwise- no new information can be 'created' through mutations- mutations simply take information already present and alter it along the same line- it turns it into freak info in otherwords- in order for a nipple to turn into an eye for instance (Yes, I know- rediculous example- but bare with me- just using a 'for instance' annalogy), NEW information from an outside source MUST be introduced- No amount of manipulation of information already present in the animal will change that nipple into an eye- it can't- it goes against the law of kind begets kind- Biologically speaking- it's impossible- We've tried and tried- but have never once mutated a gene capable of this- the evidence is so overwhelming against mutations creating new species that science has fairly recently had to be herded in another direction- gene transference. Even gene transference has it's problems however- which is another argument- I'll be happy to explain more- if you like- but htis could get quite long- suffice it to say - gene transeference is similiar to the 'genetic drift' that talkorigin attempts to define as 'evidence for evolution' but it falls far too short due to every creatures built in protection mechanisms that prevent perversion of genes beyond acceptable deviances.
Christian news and commentary at: sacredscoop.com ...
Besides- all this 'science' ignores the very core problem with evolution- the information in the DNA thast I mentioned before- in order for evolution to even be a viable question. one would have to explain where the information for the DNA came from- was it eternal? It must have been because the info could not come from nothing as evolution insists that it did. The info- which is far to advanced for mere evolving from nothing to account for, had to have a mind behind it's creation- look- we can argue symantics all day long, but at the end of the day, the problem of Gene information still plagues the evolution hypothesis. Then, you STILL have the problems of overcoming the obstacles of jumping amino acids to protiens which is impossible but an absolutely necessary process for evolution to be viable.- Then, after overcomming that impossible leap- you STILL have the problem of gene transfereance in order for species to evolve into other species- THEN- you have to explain the Cambrian explosion where entire and vast and complete species showed up on the scene all at once- Then you have to overcome the mutation conundrum where it would mathematically require a universe full of DNA and constant lightening strikes 24/7 for billions of years to create even one mutation that would be considered 'useful' enough to advance a species. The Time required is yet another impossible scenario for evolution to be viable. Talorigin can insult I.D all they like- they can cite this article and that one- but in the end- they take a HUGE leap of faith- and MUST rely on impossible hypothesis in order to beleive in their models of life.
Christian news and commentary at: sacredscoop.com ...