Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Coyoteman

I recall learning about quite a few other chemical/radioactive tests whilst in archaeology school - not just radiocarbon - do you have stats on those as well? I get kind of nervous myself whenever radiocarbon is used as the definitive test for paleological specimens...seems we are dealing with completely different chemical and radiological factors.


206 posted on 01/15/2007 8:37:56 AM PST by Alkhin (star dust contemplating star dust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: Alkhin
I recall learning about quite a few other chemical/radioactive tests whilst in archaeology school - not just radiocarbon - do you have stats on those as well? I get kind of nervous myself whenever radiocarbon is used as the definitive test for paleological specimens...seems we are dealing with completely different chemical and radiological factors.

Radiocarbon only goes back some 50,000 years. Older samples, and samples not containing carbon, require other methods.

Here is a link I posted earlier that has some good information:

Radiometric Dating: A Christian Perspective by Dr. Roger C. Wiens.

213 posted on 01/15/2007 8:42:36 AM PST by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson