Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: SampleMan
Here's a second dose of reality for you, as you appear to have avoided it the first time.

No, its simply a second dose of your self touted 'expert opinion' on MANPAD hdwe.

The logic behind an overt act of state war to bring down a single airliner for no gain of any kind is a head scratcher in itself.

The logic behind an overt act of war to bring down the WTC for no gain of any kind is another head scratcher.

Lacking an kind of material evidence that would irrefutably be present if your theory was true,

I have no specific 'theory'. - You keep irrationally insisting otherwise. That idea exists only in your mind. Poor fella.

you are left arguing that there is a massive cover-up.

I've never argued that. You have a massive misconception about what I'm posting.

That the evidence was there, but the gov't lied. Career NTSB workers with no fidelity to Clinton had to have lied, dozens of them, and not one of them came forward. Once you head down that path you are immune to facts of any kind.

Rant on. -- You're only making yourself look foolish.

But I'm supposed to discount all of this based on a party video that apparently doesn't exist.

My wife & I saw the 'party tape' loop being shown on a network satellite feed the night of the incident. - Others did too. The tape was never seen again. - Discount what you will.

193 posted on 05/09/2007 6:42:06 PM PDT by tpaine (" My most important function on the Supreme Court is to tell the majority to take a walk." -Scalia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies ]


To: tpaine
No, its simply a second dose of your self touted 'expert opinion' on MANPAD hdwe.

Its the facts. If there is something which you feel capable of disputing do so. Sticking your head in the sand and declaring it doesn't exist isn't a rebuttal.

The logic behind an overt act of war to bring down the WTC for no gain of any kind is another head scratcher.

Huh? First, no state provided easily trackable equipment for the WTC. Second, the WTC was a much bigger target with real value to terrorists. You have a major disconnect with logic.

I have no specific 'theory'. - You keep irrationally insisting otherwise. That idea exists only in your mind. Poor fella.

You have no proof. You do have a kook theory that the NTSB covered up the evidence and that a missile was involved.

I've never argued that. You have a massive misconception about what I'm posting.

Then you accept that the evidence is completely against you, that you have no point, and that you are posting simply to be annoying.

Rant on. -- You're only making yourself look foolish.

Given the volume of email I get from fellow Freepers concerning your foolishness, I'd have to disagree.

My wife & I saw the 'party tape' loop being shown on a network satellite feed the night of the incident. - Others did too. The tape was never seen again. - Discount what you will.

I saw documents shown by CBS that showed that Bush was a deserter. Although my proof is out on the table, and you haven't been able to dispute one single bit of it, you keep insisting that your party tape rules. Poor TP. Poor, poor TP.

195 posted on 05/10/2007 4:27:08 AM PDT by SampleMan (Islamic tolerance is practiced by killing you last.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson