Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: tpaine
I have no specific theory.

Non answer.

Your theories do not explain the eyewitness facts.

I haven't put forth theories. I've put forth facts. And the facts eliminate a missile. That doesn't require trying to explain what someone may or may not have seen with regard to a streak of light. You can say someone was killed by a bullet because witnesses reported a loud bang, but if the autopsy shows no bullet hole, then I don't need to identify the loud bang to factually conclude that the cause of death was not a gunshot. Very, very basic logic.

Beats me,...

So you think a streak of light might have blown it up. Tinfoil is on sale in aisle six.

You can't tell me, as a self touted missile expert?

Do you even make sense to yourself? I've told you that no missile could have done it. To give you the opportunity to debunk my facts I've asked you to name one that could. You refuse to do so, because you know it will only flag your ignorance.

I don't claim to have the answers. - You do.

That's right I do have answers, and you have provided zip to refute them. Absolutely nothing, despite being provided ample opportunities.

I've had a ~lot~ of amusement seeing you demand that I 'put up'. Get a grip on your ego.

Pathetic, as usual. You are an empty suit. This is what it always comes down to. You have nothing to offer but subterfuge.

Whatever.

Not whatever. You are no different that Rosie and you've been tagged for it. You're a loud mouth that can't back it up. A pattern of behavior that has made you infamous on FR.

221 posted on 05/10/2007 9:23:41 PM PDT by SampleMan (Islamic tolerance is practiced by killing you last.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies ]


To: SampleMan
I have no specific theory. Your theories do not explain the eyewitness facts. So it goes.

I haven't put forth theories. I've put forth facts. And the facts eliminate a missile.

Many here at FR have disputed your 'facts'. You're incapable of admitting that, poor fella.

That doesn't require trying to explain what someone may or may not have seen with regard to a streak of light. You can say someone was killed by a bullet because witnesses reported a loud bang, but if the autopsy shows no bullet hole, then I don't need to identify the loud bang to factually conclude that the cause of death was not a gunshot. Very, very basic logic.

You have a very odd conception of logic, as many here have noted over the years.

So you think a streak of light might have blown it up. Tinfoil is on sale in aisle six. Do you even make sense to yourself? I've told you that no missile could have done it. To give you the opportunity to debunk my facts I've asked you to name one that could. You refuse to do so, because you know it will only flag your ignorance.

Others here have debunked your 'facts/opinions/theories' ad nauseum over the course of many threads.

I've had a ~lot~ of amusement seeing you demand that I 'put up'. Get a grip on your ego.

Pathetic, as usual. You are an empty suit. This is what it always comes down to. You have nothing to offer but subterfuge.

Whatever. - I see you offering nothing but your 'pathetic' comments.

Not whatever. You are no different that Rosie and you've been tagged for it. You're a loud mouth that can't back it up. A pattern of behavior that has made you infamous on FR.

You too are becoming infamous for your blind support of the gov't line.

226 posted on 05/11/2007 9:41:42 AM PDT by tpaine (" My most important function on the Supreme Court is to tell the majority to take a walk." -Scalia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson