The more I think of this analogy the better I like it.
A man falls dead while crossing the street. [a plane explodes & crashes] Some people say they heard a loud noise [or saw a steak of light head for the plane] at roughly the same time. After hearing about the reports of a loud noise, more people claim they heard a gunshot. [a tape of the streak is broadcast, and many see it]
An autopsy is performed and the cause of death is determined to have been a stroke. There is no external trauma to the body and definitely no bullet hole or bullet.
[ An investigation is performed and the cause is determined to have been a explosion. There is massive trauma to the airframe allowing no definitive judgment as to the cause.]
The coroner files a report and lists the cause of death as having been caused by a stroke. No where in his report does he explain where the loud noise came from.
[The gov't files a report and lists the cause as having been caused by an explosion. No where in this report does it explain where the streak of light came from.]
Tpaine [& many others] insists that big bro failed to properly investigate [eyewitness testimony] the noise.
When asked why there is no bullet [missile] hole and what kind of [missile] gun could kill without a [hole] bullet, Tpaine [& many others] insists that he doesn't have to answer such questions, [ because of massive damage] and that the person inquiring is covering up for big bro. [ Why is the person inquiring insisting that we all agree with big bro?]
Weird joke of an 'analogy'.
You mean, "An analogy of a weird joke."
As usual, you decline to point out any faults, you just pretend that dismissing someone will diminish their point.
The test of an argument's strength is the ability to defend it. You are so aware of the weakness of your argument that you won't even attempt to defend it. And you've forfeited our invitations to challenge our facts.
You've yet to scrutinize ANYTHING that has been stated. Instead you feebly insist that it doesn't matter, like anyone is buying your act.
Lack of a bullet hole is a serious argument against death by gunfire, even if the person was run over by a truck. The same applies to airplanes and missiles. Its not like they failed to locate the wreckage.