Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Hal1950
I find Ken & Svens report credible and interesting, as does Swordmaker, obviously.

You don't? -- If not why not? -- What's your point?

239 posted on 05/12/2007 4:41:01 PM PDT by tpaine (" My most important function on the Supreme Court is to tell the majority to take a walk." -Scalia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies ]


To: tpaine
"I find Ken & Svens report credible and interesting, as does Swordmaker, obviously.

You don't? -- If not why not? -- What's your point?"

Faret & Wendell's report includes the following addendum:

We do not dispute the fact that something happened at 13,800 feet, but what happened after that. There is 5000 feet unaccounted for. We would like to emphasize: We approached the black-gray smoke cloud on the west side. We were at 7700 feet and were at the top edge of the cloud. The cloud center was at 7500 feet. There were 2 small bumps atop it. There was no smoke or smoke trails above it. It was still lit up a little by the sun, clear above. We don’t know why this has never been discussed in any scenarios.

Can you explain why?

240 posted on 05/12/2007 5:13:29 PM PDT by Hal1950
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson