"-- Yet, most of witnesses appear to have seen the fiery streak only moments before the huge fireball explosion --"
I replied:
So? --- Obviously, you think you've made a [factual] point, but what is it? [ as opinions are not facts]
No one can be as obtuse to logic as you pretend to be.
[speak for yourself s-man]
The obvious point is that if the supposed streak of light occurred after the aircraft had already been stricken and descended 6000 ft, it could not have be the culprit.
Big "IF"... Or is that fact to obtuse for you to understand?
Everything you post appears to simply be an act, designed to continue getting responses, but without any real bearing on the thread at hand.
This is not normal behavior. It is antisocial, and certainly harmful to FR.
For you to be allowed back after being banned so many times defies logic. I’ve never witnessed you adding anything but vitriol to a thread.
A lot of posters now avoid you, like they avoid a drunk on a park bench, but I refuse to be annoyed off of a thread by the likes of you.
Big "IF" summarizes your entire assertion that you refuse to defend. You have yet to make a single post that challenges any of my posts, let alone debunks an of them. Yet you claim you have a strong case.
People with strong arguments don't have to hide and run away from defending them. Nor do they have to play passive-aggressive games of pretending not to understand simple statements.