Replies

My posts point to the ~fact~ that many rational eyewitnesses saw a streak of light prior to the incident, and that a tape of that streak was played on TV shortly after, then never seen again.

You've provided no material evidence of this claim. Nor have you provided any documentation of what the witnessing claim to have seen. "A streak of light" is very vague.

I'm addressing the issue at hand,

Hardly. You refuse to address the issue.
What kind of missile was it?
If not a missile, what could it have been?
How can the time frame of the "streak" correlate to being causal to the accident?
These are but a few of the things you refuse to address.

Another bizarre personal comment, - by you.

Your behavior is what it is, antisocial.

I've been arguing the issue.

You've done nothing of the sort. You've said there was a streak. By and large, no one has argued with that. Beyond that you have implied much and argued nothing. You've yet to materially challenge any post by anyone concerning the issue of a missile. Nor have you argued your case that the streak was causal to the explosion. Not once.

All you've done is duck, run and demagogue.