Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: wagglebee
And Jim alone banned EVERY SINGLE ONE of the FRiberals on that thread. Maybe you should complain to him about it.

What for? Like they say....it's HIS house.

Political OPINIONS are often outside the realm of fact; most times they are liberal vs. conservative and in those cases, her views (pro-abortion, pro-illegal alien, pro-homosexual agenda, pro-euthasia) were liberal.

A person can be Pro-Life and still respect another woman's wish not to be pregnant. It is intellectually dishonest to call that person 'pro-abortion'.

With your line of reasoning everybody but people like Eric Rudolph must be pro-abortion...if they're not out their picketing abortion centers.

Reagan was a Democrat in a time where almost EVERY Democrat was to the right of most Republicans today and certainly to the right of Rudy.

Regardless...the point is that Ronald Reagan...the greatest president of our time...signed off on amnesty...and if he were alive and president today...he'd do it again. Get over it.

And I for one am sick and tired of hearing about an abortion bill which Reagan reluctantly signed being used as a reason for Republicans to abandon the pro-life platform. And what does Reagan have to do with the Contract with America?

Reluctantly or not...he signed it...knowing it would be abused by the democrats. Yet we all know Ronald Reagan was a man of the highest principles.

And nobody here is suggesting that the GOP abandon that plank. What we're suggesting is that we win by being in a position to appoint a couple more SCOTUS justices...and in order to do that we need to win elections.

And I'm sorry for not starting a new paragraph when I mentioned the Contract with America. I was providing another example of how intelligent republicans choose their battles wisely.

649 posted on 05/27/2007 4:48:00 PM PDT by DCPatriot ("It aint what you don't know that kills you. It's what you know that aint so" Theodore Sturgeon))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 638 | View Replies ]


To: DCPatriot

You’re trying to get someone to get Jim Robinson on this thread. Leave JR alone for gosh sakes. You are really getting frantic over nothing. Take a chill pill.


748 posted on 05/27/2007 7:33:31 PM PDT by floriduh voter (Terri's Legacy List Contact: 8mmmauser & REMEMBER TERRI IN CAMPAIGN 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 649 | View Replies ]

To: DCPatriot
Regardless...the point is that Ronald Reagan...the greatest president of our time...signed off on amnesty...and if he were alive and president today...he'd do it again. Get over it.

I don't think so.

He would have said "fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me".

Reagan was a practical conservative. He was once a tax raiser (when he was Governor of CA) until he watched as the Dems kept on spending each time he balanced the budget.

He then decided that deficits were a good club to beat over their heads every time they tried to increase spending. Essentially taking away the booze from the alcoholic.

781 posted on 05/27/2007 8:21:57 PM PDT by Donald Rumsfeld Fan (NY Times: "fake but accurate")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 649 | View Replies ]

To: DCPatriot
Reluctantly or not...he signed it...knowing it would be abused by the democrats.

So, you read Reagan's mind? Or you're channeling the dead. The Therapeutic Abortion Act was billed as a limited way for women with health problems to be allowed to have an abortion. There's no way, if Reagan knew what the Democrats were going to do, that he would have signed it. He said as much. The aspersions you cast upon Reagan, despite what he himself claimed, are despicable. You're calling Reagan a pro-abortion Governor who conspired with the Democrats to liberalize abortion and then lie about it. That is what you're implying with the crap that you just posted. I suggest that you knock the Reagan-bashing off, idiot.

857 posted on 05/27/2007 11:48:31 PM PDT by Spiff (Rudy Giuliani Quote (NY Post, 1996) "Most of Clinton's policies are very similar to most of mine.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 649 | View Replies ]

To: DCPatriot
A person can be Pro-Life and still respect another woman's wish not to be pregnant and kill her baby to make it not so. It is intellectually dishonest to call that person 'pro-abortion'.

No it isn't. Being no longer pregnant after the fact requires the inserted red text. That is honestly the case.

Can we all assume that your moniker really refers to DarwinCentralPatriot? That seems to be where your ideological allegiance lies.

931 posted on 05/28/2007 8:12:04 AM PDT by MrEdd (L. Ron Gore creator of "Fry-n-tology" the global warming religion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 649 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson