Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: DivaDelMar
SAME NUMBERS, DIFFERENT ways of calculating the rate provide different results. THERE IS NO INTENT TO DECEIVE.

Oh please, you are promoting a sales tax, and everyone adds the sales tax to the amount. Computing a tax the non standard way is meant to deceive.

33 posted on 02/17/2008 10:04:45 AM PST by Mark was here (The earth is bipolar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: Mark was here

Incorrect. The rate is quoted both ways to facilitate comparison to the income tax. A 30% sales tax is equivalent to a 23% income based tax. There is no intent to deceive, rather advocates wish to provide a valid basis of comparison. A 30% sales tax is NOT equivalent to a 30% income tax and those who don’t think about this at any depth would equate the two. In a rush to judgment, without a valid basis of comparison, most would dismiss the proposal out of hand as a tax increase. That is false.


37 posted on 02/17/2008 10:14:07 AM PST by DivaDelMar (CRAm member-- (Conservative Republicans Against mcCain) Think you're entitled to my vote? CRAm It!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson