Posted on 11/22/2008 8:50:08 PM PST by Analityk
Given the Title....How much crack ocaine have you smoked in the last several hours? Ron Paul??????? Yikes!!
Losertarian alert.
No, that's Rep. Ron Paul of the 14th District of Texas.
Ordinarily, I would say that you may have a good point, however, your sign up date is too recent.
He's right. I didn't history and you wouldn't believe all the mistakes I've made!
You must be smoking Ron Paul’s crack.
Did you have the impression this was a conservative site?!?
Newbie with a vanity alert!
History is a skank and I would never do her.
I’ve been known for spelling errors and grammatical mistakes on my posts more than once in a while (mostly because I am a fast typist and I’m simply typing as I think) —
But for something as dramatic, important, and drawn out as the above post, one would think that the author would’ve taken the time to comb it through for errors.
It reduces the subject matter to nonsense.
He's right Agarn. Look at this bill from the Heckawi! 
Get your F-Troop season 1 DVD now, before prices double on all our corny products. And don't forget our line of Frank Kapra movies for the Holidays.
Thanks for your comment. Ron Paul isn’t very popular here for various reasons, but on the bailout he’s right.
And you’re right. The bail-out puts the government squarely in the middle of our banking system. And once the public and the private mix we’re headed down a dark road.
You did make one mistake, which is that it isn’t our private bankers who are doing this, but our government and semi-government bankers who caused this, that and government rules that were imposed to force banks to do the government’s will. Banks were required to make loans that were not sound. Then semi-government banks bundled these loans and sold them abroad with an implied government guarantee. When they began to fail in large quantities the government stepped in to make them good. It was government involvement that caused the problem and government spending tax money to make it good is making it worse.
As you note, this is a large step toward a socialized banking system. Now the car companies one a piece of the action. If government agrees to another several hundred billion dollars in tax money to keep them afloat, we’ll have gone another big step down a very bad road. These companies are slowly moving their operations out of the US anyway; their foreign operations are profitable. They’ll use the bailout money to shore up their foreign operations.
When government takes control of the economy, freedom suffers and prosperity suffers too; socialized economies are usually stagnant economies.
“Now the car companies one a piece of the action”
Meant to say, “Now the car companies “want” a piece of the action...
Should I take this personally? Is it Babelfish, or a bootleg Content-free Sentence Generator? Is this what I sound like when I think I'm speaking Spanish?
Verbal mayhem ping!
That’s what happens when you read too much Analityk.
This has the potential to be another “stuned beeber,” but with none of the humor.
I agree - not funny, just puzzling. It’s very frustrating when sentences have subjects, verbs, and objects, but you just can’t get any meaning out of them.
If he were a funny drunk, it might be OK. But this is just stupid.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.