OK, have it your way, I was waiting for that. Anything that interferes with your scenario isn’t allowed to be posted, you don’t want freepers to have any information that doesn’t agree with your notions. Fine. I’m fed up with you all over again, so you can carry on. You’ve killed the thread just as you always do. You are a very very sick man, but I’ve told you that before.
HOWEVER, LET ME THANK YOU FOR DRAWING ATTENTION TO THE BLENDING OF TWO WOMEN TO FORM THE MOTHER-MYTH OF STANLEY ANN DUNAHM.
Did you learn your bully tactics while you were employed at that high security prison you wrote about? That’s got to have something to do with your inflexible, unbending personality. The stage is yours. Do what you like with it. But as usual, after I’ve been driven off by your disgusting attitude, the thread dies.
AND THAT’S WHAT YOU REALLY WANT, ISN’T IT?
I can only speak for my own experience, but it is certainly legitimate to share it here & now. I’ve had interactions w Carp. On some points we disagree—& (1) that is true to this day, & (2) Carp knows it. He has never tried to force me to agree w him, nor has he attacked or insulted me over our points of disagreement. He treats me w respect. If he gets a chance to present evidence to bolster his position, he takes it. But he has never even come close to bullying me or exerting any kind of coercion, & that is a fact.
Now re: those who are accusing Carp of such nasty tactics. Everything they are ascribing to him, THEY have done to ME. Everything, that is, & much, much more/worse. This is simply rank hypocrisy. No, scratch that. It is sickening hypocrisy. It is projection on an order I have never witnessed before. Those who wish to see civility prevail, please take note. I am still waiting to see Carp do the things he’s been accused of. I’m not waiting to see his accusers to them; they’ve done them all & far, far worse To Me.
(”We hold that the mere listing of [a parent’s] name on the . . . birth certificate is insufficient to prove paternity under our statute requiring such proof to be made by clear and convincing evidence.”)
Gina did not identify Child One’s father on Child One’s original birth certificate. At some point after Child One’s birth, Child One’s birth certificate was changed to reflect Egan as her father.
The new birth certificate bears the same certificate number as the original, as well as the same receipt date, which is identified as September 17, 1996, six days after Child One’s birth.
While the original certificate did not identify either Child One’s “father’s name” or “father’s race,” the new certificate identifies Child One’s father as “Egan Hajime Inoue,” and her father’s race as “Japanese.”
Inoue v. Inoue, 185 P. 3d 834 - Haw: Intermediate Court of Appeals 2008