There you go again, playing the victim, stealing more oxygen, you have never, that I can recall, provided one lick of information that might have been of interest, it’s just poor poor me...and how upset you’ve been. Cry me a river. We have all had enough of a hard time trying to keep track of the misinformation deliberately spread by the paid operatives, let alone make time to correct such items as the stupid comment made by your hero; that I maintained SAD never saw the child until he was three years old. That’s one straight out of his addled brain. And life’s too short for that.
She took him to see Susan Blake when he was a few weeks old. She presented him as her own. And as there’s been no physical sign of her in Hawaii either before or after the miraculous birth, it’s fair to ask, whose child did she show to Susan Blake?
Like the man said, he didn’t go around with his birth certificate plastered to his forehead...
Stop whining and produce something interesting, your buddy is more than capable of sticking it to people with theories he doesn’t like, without your help.
Get cracking, we aren’t here to prove how clever we are, we are trying to fill in a few gaps in the flawed narrative.
“comment made by your hero”
I don’t have earthly heroes. Jesus is as close as I come to having a hero, but I don’t call Him that. I all Him Lord, Savior...& friend.
May He bless you always, FW
“She took him to see Susan Blake when he was a few weeks old. She presented him as her own. And as there’s been no physical sign of her in Hawaii either before or after the miraculous birth, it’s fair to ask, whose child did she show to Susan Blake?”
No evidence for the above claim has been provided and abundant VERIFYABLE evidence refutes it including INS FOIA documents, U of HI transcripts, U of WA transcripts, HI Polk registry, numerous witnesses.
See Mal-Val thread:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-backroom/2913366/posts?page=265