[Greenperson]

Fred Nerks wrote: “Most people haven’t even noticed.

The answers to questions on that form that the kenyan did complete, was obviously what he wanted the immigration department to know.

The answers to the questions that the additional handwritng completed might just be what the person who added it, WANTS US TO KNOW.

You’ll never know WHO it was because they didn’t sign it. And you’ll never know WHEN the material was added, because it isn’t dated.

I gather that the formal, accepted method is to write a memo by hand or type it, with a date and a signature. If you scroll through the file, you’ll see that’s how most of the questions are treated.

Why should this one be different? The information added is crucial to the mythos of birth and parentage. It’s simply not good enough IMO to have it appear UNDATED AND ANONYMOUSLY.”

Excellent points. If he was sitting there when the other person questioned the blanks, then BHO Sr. would have written the data himself. If he wasn’t there, then it would seem that protocol would require the person filling in the blanks to initial what was added.

I did NOT notice before that the documents had different handwriting. It’s crucial that BHO Sr. seems never to have mentioned that son—not to his friends in Hawaii, not to the newspaper reporters who wrote the stories about him, not to the people we see him partying with in photos, not on these documents, even just weeks after the alleged birth. We do have the tales told by the Kenyan “relatives” who claim to remember him carrying around a photo of little Barry.

[Fred Nerks]

...I did NOT notice before that the documents had different handwriting. It’s crucial that BHO Sr. seems never to have mentioned that son—not to his friends in Hawaii, not to the newspaper reporters who wrote the stories about him, not to the people we see him partying with in photos, not on these documents, even just weeks after the alleged birth. We do have the tales told by the Kenyan “relatives” who claim to remember him carrying around a photo of little Barry.

You always were a smart cookie. I've said as much many times. Unless we see the photograph he reportedly carried around, we won't know who his son was, will we?

One very astute member of our team, a long time ago, made a comment I will never forget.

DON'T FORGET THERE WILL BE UNWILLING PARTICIPANTS IN THIS DECEPTION.

I thought of that again today when I read that while he was at Harvard, he told his associates that he had visited his son SEVERAL TIMES. Obviously, the son he visited several times wasn't in Hawaii.