Welcome to FR.
We’re doing what we often do on FR- brainstorm, toss ideas around to be checked out, refuted or verified.
Clearly- there is MUCH that is NOT known. It is possible that the Kenyan bc that was the subject of the phone conversation you refer to is not authentic. This one may not be either- but we continue to dig, research and hunt.
You are right, we will throw all sorts of stuff out there, not as fact but hoping someone can confirm or deny an aspect of it.
Like throwing darts blindfolded, hoping one stick on bullseye.
Sadly our brainstorimg is seen as foolishness by many. Our willingness to throw out ideas to be confirmed or denied is read as gullible. I have no problem if anyone disagrees with me. If I am wrong about anything I can admit it (sometimes my pride gets in the way, but hey, I am human).
But the one thing that really pisses me off are the holier than thou’s who cannot wait to tell us what useful village idiots we are because we are willing to explore an event to its logical conclusion.
I know that I would rather make an informed judgement after gathering as many facts as I can. Just as I don’t accept the authenticity of this doc on faith, neither do I accept the declaration of it being a fraud by the posters who seem to think they are so much smarter than the rest of us.
If that makes us useful idiots, so be it.
Just in case my post reads wrong, I am agreeing with your post. Sometimes my posts do not read the way I intended. I worry about that.