They don’t show these others so we can see for ourselves.
Geez, WND, show 'em if you got 'em. A circa 1964 Kenyan BC is what everyone needs to see right now. These examples make a huge impact, for example, the 1961 Hawaiian twins.
They do show one or two. One of them is a certification on the same day (Feb. 17, 1964) of a birth in August, 1961 (Aug. 9 or something). They are strikingly similar—same officials, similar page locations in the official book etc. Of course, both could have been faked. One would need a few dozen, I suppose, before it would begin to be too much for a forger to have gone through.
On the other hand, with all that might be riding on this, I suppose a really smart forger might have made 100 or 200 extras! We need documents of similar date and data from a source indepedent of WND.
If forensics are done on the actual document from which the photos were made, the work would delve even into the residues on the paper in the different fold sections. ANY pollen--for instance--embedded in the paper from 1964 in Kenya or anywhere else would be an affirmation. THAT is the sort of thing a forensic exam would seek to find for authentication.
Part of the problem with WND, and why I stopped going there except when someone links an article from there. Some (most?) of their proceeds come from sales. Best way to keep sales up is to have people keep coming back. If they show all their cards in one article then they don’t have four or five others that say basically the same thing to generate sales.