Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: giotto
The one thing that stands out to me to suggest that it might be a recent document is that the corners of the document appear crisp. The manner in which the document was folded would likely result in faded corners on an aged document.

Otherwise it looks like a better and more authentic BC than my own.

2,871 posted on 08/02/2009 2:01:11 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2851 | View Replies ]


To: P-Marlowe

Yes, but a certified copy could be issued at any time, it’s not the original.


2,879 posted on 08/02/2009 2:02:22 PM PDT by 1000 silverlings (Everything that deceives also enchants: Plato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2871 | View Replies ]

To: P-Marlowe
There are signs of wear. The intersections where the paper was folded. and then folded again, have little holes.

However, this brings up a larger question, which may already have been asked and answered in this thread, but I don't have six hours to read all the posts. Here is the question:

Why would someone have kept a folded copy of this document for four decades? No one, other than a parent or guardian, would keep such a thing for that long. If this had been filed in some government office in Kenya, it would have been filed flat, not folded. What is the supposed provenance of this document?

3,195 posted on 08/02/2009 3:02:22 PM PDT by giotto (title:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2871 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson