Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur
I don't totally disagree that this particular case could be deemed frivolous.

While Taitz’ intentions may be good, she is inept. The CA case is much more likely to go forward. The DOJ motion to dismiss is very weak and specifically did not address Carter's statement that the case will be decided on the merits.

Based on that, I think he is going to order production of the long form BC. I also think he is going to pretty much ignore Taitz and focus on the pleadings of Kreep. He seems to know how to approach this case.

352 posted on 09/16/2009 1:25:10 PM PDT by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 347 | View Replies ]


To: SeaHawkFan
The CA case is much more likely to go forward. The DOJ motion to dismiss is very weak...

I think the motion to dismiss is very strong myself.

...and specifically did not address Carter's statement that the case will be decided on the merits.

Of course they did. The whole point behind the motion to dismiss is to refute the idea that the case has any merit to begin with. If the plaintiffs have no standing and if the court doesn't have jurisdiction then there is no merit to the case, now is there?

Based on that, I think he is going to order production of the long form BC. I also think he is going to pretty much ignore Taitz and focus on the pleadings of Kreep. He seems to know how to approach this case.

I disagree. I think you're going to be very disappointed come early October.

354 posted on 09/16/2009 1:39:38 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 352 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson