The judge pointed out that burden fell on Rhodes because she sought the restraining order to stop her deployment.
Fine. Let's roll.
Ping!
Then will she have standing?
This STUPID judge is one of those held accountable by his oath of office in article six to "support this Constitution". This means that HE is held accountable to ENFORCE all of the Constitution including section three of the twentieth amendment which reads as follows:
”3. If, at the time fixed for the beginning of the term of the President, the President elect shall have died, the Vice President elect shall become President. If a President shall not have been chosen before the time fixed for the beginning of his term, or if the President elect shall have failed to qualify, then the Vice President elect shall act as President until a President shall have qualified; and the Congress may by law provide for the case wherein neither a President elect nor a Vice President elect shall have qualified, declaring who shall then act as President, or the manner in which one who is to act shall be selected, and such person shall act accordingly until a President or Vice President shall have qualified.”
The burden of PROVING his eligibility to CONGRESS and anyone who insist that the Constitution be obeyed is the "President elect". It is the "President elect" who either succeeds in doing so are "shall have failed" to do so. Congress is ordered to name a replacement if this occurs so they MUST be made aware of whether or not he fails at qualifying. This judge is WRONG and should be held accountable for not obeying HIS oath of office requiring him to ENFORCE the Constitution.
So what happens now? What is the next step?
And what happened with the court case in Santa Ana today? Is discovery proceeding?
Thanks.