[muawiyah]

What copy machine? You got a copy machine back there in 1961 let me see it. Xerox_914 was the FIRST, and it was sold starting in 1959. Huge, hulk of a device ~ took 24 seconds per copy. They didn't have a desk top for sale until 1965. The first desk top I got to play with arrived in an office where I worked in 1965 ~ we didn't mind paper jams in those days. If your choice had been making a master on mimeograph paper, this was NEAT O ~ but there was this little byline at the bottom telling the recipient this was a photo copy.

Now, more recently, I suppose that copies were made of the 2 master copies the lawyer brought over from Hawaii the other day. There's also a digital copy of those copies. I don't think anyone has yet claimed a digital copy of the signal sent from the data base system to a printer, but that'll be up eventually.

So, yes, everything "NORMAL"

[JohnnyP]

Why do we keep getting pictures of a thing, rather than the thing itself?

The State of Washington sent me a copy of mine. I can lay it on the table and let you look at it.

Why won’t he do the same for the “Journolists”? But they don’t care, they would rather see what he gave them. lap dogs.

[Mr. K]

geez you are seriously TRYING to be a dumbass aren’t you...

I did not say photocopy it back in the 60’s [when copiers didnt exist], I said make a photocopy today, of the HAND MADE AND MANUALLY TYPED DOCUMENT they made for him in the 60’s... if he has one.

What he showed the other day is not one.

It is not even a copy of one.

It is a modern day manufactured digital file with layers. This would not even be such an easy document to prove it was fake if they had compressed the PDF into one layer (easily done)... Just look at the one the Associated Press (AP) DOCTORED FOR HIM... They took the time to compress it and releasae it.

By the way- anyone have a copy of that AP compressed-layer file? It will show (internally) that it was editted that day, and if we are lucky some identifying info of the computer it was editted on.