[gov_bean_ counter]

Well, there is always private tutoring...

[truthfreedom]

why are all of these US stories from the UK press?

[Para-Ord.45]

!!! NOT GUILTY !!!

[PapaBear3625]

I'd agree with Not Guilty. Excellent condition for 39.

[abb]

[FroggyTheGremlim]

Biology teacher, eh?

[newfreep]

[Castigar]

WOW! Def NOT Guilty!

[Larry Lucido]

Parially naked? I’m always at least partially naked.

[The_Media_never_lie]

Not guilty, girls will be girls.

[deport]

From back when the story first broke if anyone is interested in the comments, photos thereon.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2690164/posts

[Truth is a Weapon]

I just can’t understand the thinking of these women. If someone who looks like this would cruise a local junior college campus she could easily find comparable action and it would all be legal.

[Lancey Howard]

Absolutely not guilty.
I bet that kid is pissed they got caught..

[Blennos]

17 years old is hardly a child. What she did is an indiscretion, not a crime.

[Republic of Texas]

Had this been a male teacher, he would be serving a life sentence as we speak.

[JusPasenThru]

This has been extensively covered in the Louisville press. I’m about 2 degrees removed from this: I know people who know people who know her.

The whole thing is tragic. She evidently was a good teacher, this episode notwithstanding. She is prevented from teaching for three years (of course no one will ever hire her again) and her family is going through hell.

When I saw the photo I thought she looked moonbat crazy, and maybe she is, but when I saw the video of the court proceedings she just looked scared and about ready to burst out into tears at any moment.

[Cyman]

Not only not guilty but also above suspicion!

[UglyinLA]

She’s guilty and she needs to do some HARD TIME... heh heh

[WellyP]

She’s lovely. I’d be happy to cook dinner for her any time she wishes. The kid wasn’t injured. To his mates he is “the stud”!

[Norm Lenhart]

Every time this happens there is a mad rush of the moral that these women should be strung up. That said, our laws are our laws and so guilty she is.

But if we look back a mere 50-100 years, women were married with kids at 15-16.

A 17 year old is no child.

Alexander led armies before he hit 20. The Marquis de Lafeyette helped found this nation before 20.
Guess we know more in the last 50 years time than all of human history. Not

And then there’s that whole puberty thing...what does that signify again? Oh yea...sexual maturity. By 17 that’s long over.