Posted on 06/07/2011 6:45:09 PM PDT by conservativegramma
Barry's father wasn't even a U.S. resident.
In fact he was pretty much deported.
He returned to Kenya and become a government official.
your avoiding answering mmy questions and making broad statements..
google is your friend:
maternity hospital admittance form
Hell no!
I now beleive that the word has spread among most in Congress, the intelligence community, the military and judiciary that they had better not cross the line. They have threatened their families if they cross the line. It’s a joke and that’s all there is to it. Bottom line: As long as the USA is a strong and soverign country, they can’t implement the New World Order/One World government. So they’re bringing us down.
So, as I said, marrying a foreign national starts the “natural born citizen” clock all over again. Only the children of the children of such a marriage (assuming citizenship is not achieved for spouse) are POTUS eligible.
That is really your interpretation?
Sorry if the question is redundant, but I have to see the answer again to believe my eyes.
WOW!!!
>>”Had I (well, her) had a child before my wife was a US Citizen, would said child be ineligible for POTUS?”
Hell no!<<
I’l alert the Supreme Court they have been wrong all these years.
Thanks for making your understanding clear. At least you are direct.
Just not possible.
I misread that to say 'eligible' instead of 'ineligible.' More deliberate confusion on your part I suspect. So the answer is "Hell yes." No eligible.
Yes.
What so bad about that?
My oldest child's mother did not become a citizen
until a year after he was born so I am in the same boat as you.
This just proves even lawyers lie to get paid. McCain was not born on an American base, the Framer’s intention is the lawyers devised history as is any precedent. The Senators accepting such devious gibberish are also guilty of perjury.
So, you old bat, which way are you swinging on this ~ do you think it’s a forgery, or do you think it’s real?
>>Barry’s father wasn’t even a U.S. resident.<<
Irrelevant to the proposition. We are looking at a simple Citizen/Not-citizen condition.
Situation #2? Dual citizenship? Child is not POTUS-eligible?
The SCOTUS has never made a ruling on the subject directly. More intentional obfuscation on your part.
Compare the serifs of the 1 digits in the serial number.
shame on you
you lose a discussion for lack of merit to support your position and are now badmouthing grannny.
It’s kind of funny since muawiyah is an old bat too. LOL
>>I misread that to say ‘eligible’ instead of ‘ineligible.’ More deliberate confusion on your part I suspect. <<
I reserve the right to not only LMAO for that comment, but invite others to do so as well. I state my exact question and that sews confusion. You gotta admit, that’s entertainment.
>>So the answer is “Hell yes.” No eligible. <<
As I figured. Not legally accurate but we at least have at least one foot nailed to the floor. We can put some chalk on the other foot and watch the spirograph circles.
Only if was replanted for a minimum of 14 years and gets a majority of the electoral votes.
Anybody who depends on the Constitution to vet presidents is hopelessly naive.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.