Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Palin is not running for the republican nomination. She's going rogue!

Posted on 06/19/2011 7:01:27 PM PDT by RED SOUTH

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-174 next last
To: Jim Scott
The nonsense often bandied about these forums that Sarah Palin is, in effect, ‘only in it for the money’ is one of the left’s PDS talking points and unworthy of a conservative forum...

...and unworthy of conservatives.

. The Palin-as-kingmaker concept is also flawed when one looks at her record, which is hardly that of a manipulating power-driven pol...

Would her ability to be a kingmaker survive her decision not to run? Hard to say.

Again, aside from the trolls, too many liberal talking points are used against Sarah Palin by folks who should know better...

I worry about the future of the party and the country when conservatives are yoked with the likes of these.

141 posted on 06/20/2011 11:20:04 AM PDT by gogeo (...and if you're greener than Gore, you're green enough!!! Robert A Hall)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: gogeo

Thank you for being civil about it. Too many on here are not civil. We can disagree without being disagreeable.


142 posted on 06/20/2011 11:23:50 AM PDT by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: wtc911
Sounds like you've been giving this a lot of thought...

...about why Palin shouldn't run.

143 posted on 06/20/2011 11:26:14 AM PDT by gogeo (...and if you're greener than Gore, you're green enough!!! Robert A Hall)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
Palin is better for the GOP and the entire ticket, than her challenger, Mitt Romney

Agree totally. Romney loses Iowa (he is not their kind of candidate) and $ dry up. Then, with no $, he loses NH, and it's all over. He is Guilianni, 2012.

Palin will not run.

Right now the field is wide open, and the eventual candidate may not even be mentioned at this point.

Remember the name Thune.

144 posted on 06/20/2011 11:34:19 AM PDT by MindBender26 (Forget AMEX, remember your Glock 27: Never Leave Home Without It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: CharacterCounts
The tea party (and Palin)could well emerge from a Romney loss as the successor to a devastated GOP...

Very plausible.

145 posted on 06/20/2011 11:35:21 AM PDT by gogeo (...and if you're greener than Gore, you're green enough!!! Robert A Hall)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith
Understanding the difference between them, based the reason given above, defines one’s competence to fill out the voting ballot...

Very well stated, and VERY TRUE.

146 posted on 06/20/2011 11:37:23 AM PDT by gogeo (...and if you're greener than Gore, you're green enough!!! Robert A Hall)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
I'm sorry, but she would lose the general badly, however, because of the media-generated attacks that still linger over her...

Every time I see this 'logic' I shake my head.

What conservative candidate worth voting for will not be savagely attacked by the press?

147 posted on 06/20/2011 11:38:56 AM PDT by gogeo (...and if you're greener than Gore, you're green enough!!! Robert A Hall)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: gogeo
Sounds like you've been giving this a lot of thought... ...about why Palin shouldn't run.

________________________________________

Half right.

I have given a lot of thought to her actual, real-world qualifications based on her performance as mayor and Governor as well as to whether or not her quitting with multiple excuses would kill her chance to be elected and imo she is neither qualified nor electable.

148 posted on 06/20/2011 11:42:01 AM PDT by wtc911 ("How you gonna get down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
What you really mean is, "All we hyper-conservatives have to do is beat the mainline, Ronald Reagan conservatives...

What does that mean? What makes some a hyper-conservative, and what makes one a "mainline, Ronald Reagan conservative?"

I'm amazed that some don't recognize the very rhetoric being used against Palin was also used against Reagan.

IMO, trying to create daylight between RR and what you call "hyper-conservatives," is flawed in the premise.

149 posted on 06/20/2011 11:43:47 AM PDT by gogeo (...and if you're greener than Gore, you're green enough!!! Robert A Hall)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

No, I don’t see Thune suddenly becoming somebody, then sweeping the conservative base, then suddenly becoming a record breaking, fund raising monster, and then crushing the already in place, fully developed, GOP establishment supported, Romney machine.


150 posted on 06/20/2011 11:44:51 AM PDT by ansel12 (America has close to India population of 1950s, India has 1,200,000,000 people now. Quality of Life?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
No, it comes from someone with 40 years experience following national elections and reading the polls...

I'm sure there are many who have the credential you claim who would disagree with you. What value does it confer?

151 posted on 06/20/2011 11:46:41 AM PDT by gogeo (...and if you're greener than Gore, you're green enough!!! Robert A Hall)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
Those are fatal numbers...

Those are meaningless numbers at this point.

I am a Palin supporter...yet I recognize that the election is for her to win or lose, not me.

She will have to move those numbers. I think it's very doable.

152 posted on 06/20/2011 11:50:08 AM PDT by gogeo (...and if you're greener than Gore, you're green enough!!! Robert A Hall)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
I do know a bit about Presidential elections. My first one covered was Goldwater v. Johnson...

You seem to be making the mistake a lot of Generals make, fighting the last war.

153 posted on 06/20/2011 11:53:07 AM PDT by gogeo (...and if you're greener than Gore, you're green enough!!! Robert A Hall)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
Every conservative I know would vote for Obama before the backstabber Mitt Romney.

Man, do you ever have that one right!

After all of the years of donating money (not that much in the big picture, but still some), dedicating time and effort, trying to support Conservatives in every way possible. If Romney is the big reward, then I'll have no part of it. I will help torch the Republican party. I'll make damn sure to do it by voting for Obama.

After being back stabbed and abandoned for years by my "friends" in the Republican party, why do I owe them my allegiance?
154 posted on 06/20/2011 12:08:29 PM PDT by dbehsman (If Romney McMilquetoast is the best the Republican party can do, they deserve to be exterminated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

No, she will be the President—and all rinos, progressives, Marxists and other Alinsky-following crybabies will have to deal with it.


155 posted on 06/20/2011 12:11:29 PM PDT by reasonisfaith (Pray for Israel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
In December, 2007, everyone wss saying "No, I don’t see Thune Obama suddenly becoming somebody, then sweeping the conservative far-left base, then suddenly becoming a record breaking, fund raising monster, and then crushing the already in place, fully developed, GOP Democrat establishment supported, Romney Hillary Clinton machine.

:)

156 posted on 06/20/2011 12:54:14 PM PDT by MindBender26 (Forget AMEX, remember your Glock 27: Never Leave Home Without It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
Actually in December 2007, Obama and Hillary were fighting for the one and two slots, just as they had been back in July of 2007, and April of 2007, and January of 2007.

It was just like Palin and Romney, except not nearly as close to each other as Palin and Romney are, and have been for years.


157 posted on 06/20/2011 1:12:11 PM PDT by ansel12 (America has close to India population of 1950s, India has 1,200,000,000 people now. Quality of Life?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
Nominating a candidate who cannot win the general is idiocy.

Like in 2008?

158 posted on 06/20/2011 2:16:28 PM PDT by CharacterCounts (November 4, 2008 - the day America drank the Kool-Aid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: CharacterCounts

Exactly


159 posted on 06/20/2011 2:17:51 PM PDT by MindBender26 (Forget AMEX, remember your Glock 27: Never Leave Home Without It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: dbehsman

I hear you. But I would never go so far as to vote for zero, I would die first.

If Romney gets the R nomination, I will not vote for him and I will encourage everyone that I know to not vote for him.

I will simply write in the name of someone who is true conservative patriot.

No more rinos.


160 posted on 06/20/2011 8:55:17 PM PDT by Reddy (B.O. stinks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-174 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson