Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: RED SOUTH
Wow. I think you nailed it.

Somebody needs to send this to Mark Levin.

Mark, I love ya, man, more than you could know, but you must drop the "I'll vote for Elmer Fudd" false beacon.

Romney as president -- and he disastrously could be, as Obama becomes more despised by Americans every day, and he is -- would guarantee inflammation of statist liberalism at all levels of government, only it would be WORSE because it was done under the "conservative" banner, because AS LONG AS YOU VOTE FOR ELMER FUDD, you will be allowing the GOP to blatantly misrepresent itself as the party of limited government conservatism. Congratulations -- you just voted for more statist liberalism and delivered a blow to the strength and unity of true limited government Americans.

God bless Sarah Palin.

38 posted on 06/19/2011 8:03:36 PM PDT by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Finny

It would be worse because a “Republican” President Romney could get much of the communist Obama stuff that he favors passed by the Republican Congress that the kenyan can’t get through. Then in 2012 the country will be just as tired of him as it is now of the kenyan that he will lose to the Democrats i.e. Romney will serve as a place holder for the Democrats, maybe even the kenyan again and will get their stuff passed and ready for them to really get serious with the wrecking ball.


165 posted on 06/25/2011 6:53:14 PM PDT by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's "Economics In One Lesson.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson